Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2007 23:11:53 -0800
On Sat, 20 Jan 2007, Proginoskes wrote:
A proposal for Proginoskes
(2) becomes immediate effective without concern of (1) upon Proginoskes'(2) I will never reply to another AP thread.Insert: And will never mention AP in any medium of any form.
(3) These conditions become effective upon the post of a reply wherein
AP agrees to them.
instant realization (without regard to AP's response which always includes
hook, line and sinker for Proginoskes to swallow) that Proginoskes doesn't
need AP's help to rescue Proginoskes from his imposed imposition.
You are willing to honor yourself and this newsgroup by honoring conditionI am willing to honor these conditions if AP is; if AP feels that he
has to resort to ad hominem attacks against me, then I will break these
conditions.
(2) immediate without regard to (3) or the meaningless pipe dream of (1).
We await your approval Christopher Heckman, and expect not nor await forSubmitted for approval.
any other approvals as none other are needed.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- From: a_plutonium
- Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- References:
- A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- From: Proginoskes
- A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- Prev by Date: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Next by Date: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- Next by thread: Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- Index(es):