Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 20:32:01 +0100
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:08:02 +0000 (UTC), stephen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Another case of "congeniality"! :-)And Han claims to understand them, which is the definition
[WM's] arguments can't be wrong because they are obvious!
of mathematical truth. :)
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- References:
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: Carsten Schultz
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: G . Frege
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- From: stephen
- Re: Cantor Confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider
- Next by Date: Re: a simple(?) probability question...
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Index(es):