Re: editorial policy question

drmwecker@xxxxxxxxx writes:

Most of the better journals use double-blind refereeing, so, in
practice, it should not come about that either of reviewer and editor
knows the other party.

Thanks for pointing that out. You mean "reviewer and author", I assume.
--
Ignorantly,
Allan Adler <a...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
* Disclaimer: I am a guest and *not* a member of the MIT CSAIL. My actions and
* comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. Also, I am nowhere near Boston.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: editorial policy question
    ... You mean "reviewer and author", ... Well, a junior researcher might ... neither party should try to contact the other until after ... the editor has made his decision. ...
    (sci.math)
  • editorial policy question
    ... between author and reviewer had to be done through the editor. ... write his report with the largest possible freedom. ... without the permission of the editor is incorrect, ... absolutely certain what the explicit policy is of journals and their ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Submitting is easy once you stop thinking about it
    ... upon getting back comments from an anonymous reviewer ... Einstein sent back essentially that sort of letter (though, of course, ... and that he was never sending the editor an article again ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: getting out of LaTeX
    ... How does the editor know the reviewer even looked at it? ... And if s/he does, how does s/he know the client will pay the ... The evidence that a text has been translated is the translation. ...
    (sci.lang)
  • Re: Another Awful Scope Review
    ... I did my best to paint a rosy picture. ... Reviewer: "Another Great Muddy Success?" ... Editor:" Sounds good to me Son!" ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
Quantcast