Jack Sarfatti's Fartless Propulsion & the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men

this is the second time that I've seen you mention Lanczos, and
his supposed results. so, since I'm not an expert on him,
why don't you tell us what he said
about a "propellantless propulsion," please?

A physical meaning of nonmetricity is extra space dimensions like in
string theory because the gravity field tetrads are able to rotate into
hyperspace between the brane worlds. Therefore, the length of
geometrodynamic vectors in the 4D brane (on which Yang-Mills
electroweak-strong fields are stuck like flies on flypaper) can change.
However, the lengths of non-gravity field vectors cannot change so
that this kind of hyperspace nonmetricity tensor would not be universal.

Now Hammond writes:Note he has a nonsymmetric matter tensor. C. Lanzcos showed that it
will allow propellantless propulsion like Shipov's 4D gyro where
mechanical rotating masses generate these antisymmetric torsion fields.
This makes Shipov's claims more plausible.http://www.shipov.com

Looking only at the symmetric piece Hammond's eq.(5) and (7).

thus:
it might be suitable for a graphic novel -- comic book --
with AP, JSH and the MDT guy, flying around Universe
in their underwear, smiting physists & mathists for Justice,
with all of us, the sum-total of their dedicated audience (perhaps
even their sole or primary raison d'etre) characterized
as suitably maladroit Wanabis, not really the forces of evil,
themselves (so as to maintain our dramatis personae
for the never-ending sequelae; "welcome to d'hotel googolplex,
you can login any time you like" .-)

also, there's plenty of tutorial advice out there,
for doing Anime. I mean, Oxford has already gotten
into the act, with their _History of US_ curriculum
-- endorsed by George and Laura Bush on the 1-vol. overview --
by which the Encyclopedia Brit. has gained a new market
at Santa Monica/Malibu Unified. they kiss TR's ***, and
you can, two!


thus:
quelle absurd -- your stuff doesn't even *attempt*
to look at quantum mechanics, just relativity --
while changing nothing of that but phraseology,
insofar as you actually may have understood it. obviously,
you are not a good liar, or are totally out of your depth
(probably haven't even proved the pythagorean theorem, although
there are hundreds of examples to look at !-)

this just in:
yesterday's (Tues,. Nov.15) *UCLA Daily Bruin* finally noted that
darfur is entirely Muslim, though downplaying it AMAP.

thus:
*** Cheeny, Don Rumsfeld, Osama bin Latin and HARRY POTTER
-- which is a real, fictional character? -- form a mission
to Darfur, to prevent a war instead of to start one:
if Darfur is "100% Muslim," then
what's really going on, there?
is it just aother British Quag for USA soldiers to get bogged
into, with Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan et al ad vomitorium,
under auspices of the UN and NATO?
why won't the Bruin publish the fact of Islam on the ground,
therein?

thus:
Why doesn't the [UCLA Daily] Bruin report that
Darfur's populace is "100%" Muslim,
according to the DAC's sponsor,
Terry Saunders?...
"99%" was the figure given
by Brian Steidle, when I finally found
him at the Hammer, after everyone else
had left (he, his friend & I were the
very last to leave!)...
What could it possibly mean?

--The Other Side (if it exists ... nah !-)

.

Quantcast