Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- From: davidmarcus@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 26 Jan 2007 21:03:22 -0800
On Jan 26, 11:36 pm, "David T. Ashley" <d...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Leo" <newsdon...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:1169780763.086460.114690@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Which set has more numbers, the set of rational numbers or the set ofWell, the set of irrational numbers has at least twice as many elements as
irrational numbers?
the set of rational numbers.
Think about the following functions:
f(x) = PI + x
g(x) = PI + PI + x
Every rational number x can be paired with at least two irrationals.
So, I'm going to go with "irrational" as being bigger.
Right answer. Wrong reason. The rationals are countable. The
irrationals are uncountable. The rationals have Lebesgue measure zero.
The irrationals in [0,1] have Lebesgue measure 1.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- From: David T. Ashley
- Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- References:
- Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- From: Leo
- Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- From: David T. Ashley
- Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- Prev by Date: Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R
- Next by Date: Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R
- Previous by thread: Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- Next by thread: Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading