Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference
- From: G. Frege <nomail@invalid>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 13:16:06 +0100
On 29 Jan 2007 22:31:44 +1100, Logan Lee <10464307@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'd say:
Let A+B denote A or B.
Let A.B denote A and B.
Let A+B denote A union B.
Let A.B denote A intersection B.
....is not very convincing (to say the least).
Symmetric difference of two sets A and B is
A Delta B = (A-B)+(B-A)
Prove that
A Delta (B Delta C) = (A Delta B) Delta C
_My Proof_
Haha! Good joke! You assume what you want to prove! :-)
Let's assume that (A Delta C) Delta B = A Delta (C Delta B).
Note that we are interested in the theorem:
For any sets A,B,C:
A Delta (B Delta C) = (A Delta B) Delta C
Renaming the bound variables doesn't change the "meaning" of the
theorem (i.e. the altered and the original formulation are logically
equivalent).
Hence we may formulate it the following way too:
For any sets A,B,C:
A Delta (C Delta B) = (A Delta C) Delta B.
(Just changed the variable names: B <-> C.)
Since "=" is symmetric this is equivalent to:
For any sets A,B,C:
(A Delta C) Delta B = A Delta (C Delta B).
Just omitting the explicit statement of the universal quantifiers, we
get:
(A Delta C) Delta B = A Delta (C Delta B).
So _assuming_ that associativity DOES hold for the delta-operation,
you "prove" that it does hold. Wow!
Moreover:
You shouldn't just _assume_ things which have to be proved!
Let's assume also that you can apply distributive law to this.
(It's _not obvious_ that the distributive law holds for the
delta-operation. Hence you have to prove this.)
F.
--
E-mail: info<at>simple-line<dot>de
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference
- Prev by Date: Re: sum(1/binomial(n,k), k=0..n)
- Next by Date: Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|