Re: Cantor Confusion



On 28 Jan., 11:05, Andy Smith <A...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
G. Frege <nomail@invalid.?.invalid> writes>On 27 Jan 2007 21:10:06 -0800, davidmar...@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I think that Cantor's diagonalisation argument has a terminal flaw.

You have earned crank status now. Congratulations!

It would seem so. Andy keeps posting the same argument without taking
into account the comments made on his previous posts.

Right. I've also noticed that. Btw, a rather interesting experience:
to meet a crank in statu nascendi!

Fair enough. But most cranks are probably convinced that they are right

In particular this one. A typical attribute of this crank is his
frequent change of (anonymous (--> coward)) names like Amicus, Gregor
H. or G. Frege. It is pointless to discuss with him.

Regards, WM


.

Relevant Pages