sci.math

• Date Index

---

• Which one is the correct Newton's law?, johnson
  • Re: Which one is the correct Newton's law?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: Which one is the correct Newton's law?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Which one is the correct Newton's law?, Dirk Van de moortel
• graph theory question, TefJlives
• Question About Convention, Jonathan Groves
  • Re: Question About Convention, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Question About Convention, Jonathan Groves
      • Re: Question About Convention, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Question About Convention, Jonathan Groves
• Spectral norm differentiable?, Sayaka Fujisaki
  • Re: Spectral norm differentiable?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• compact hypotesis, Philips
  • Re: compact hypotesis, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Embedding hash value in data, Draco
  • Re: Embedding hash value in data, David T. Ashley
    • Re: Embedding hash value in data, Draco
      • Re: Embedding hash value in data, David T. Ashley
• Singular Values of a matrix after a Similarity transform, prasanna . rangarajan
• Complex..., Anolethron
  • Re: Complex..., Dave Seaman
  • Re: Complex..., The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Complex = 2 * Real, JEMebius
• transcendental equation, John
  • Re: transcendental equation, Bart Goddard
  • Re: transcendental equation, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: transcendental equation, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: transcendental equation, Ioannis
  • Re: transcendental equation, Klueless
• Prof. John Nash, Richard
  • Re: Prof. John Nash, soutjhyDin
• Explicit examples exist?, TCL
• Re: Minkowski Metric Is Broken, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Descartes Rule of Sweeps, Don McConnell
  • Re: Descartes Rule of Sweeps, Jon Slaughter
• Harmonic Cantilever, Han de Bruijn
• Re: Newtonian gravity solutions, Freiddy
  • Re: Newtonian gravity solutions, Michael Jørgensen
• inner product, positive definite, i . love . jeevitha
• A problem and conjecture on the product of fields, Jose Capco
  • Re: A problem and conjecture on the product of fields, Jyrki Lahtonen
• I need help!, Yanhongshe
  • Re: I need help!, Jose Capco
    • Re: I need help!, Yanhongshe
• Odds, sjewins
  • Re: Odds, David Marcus
• meaning of mixed partial, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: meaning of mixed partial, Freiddy
• semisimple ring, Arman
• Dedekind cuts, Kiuhnm
  • Re: Dedekind cuts, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Dedekind cuts, Kiuhnm
• Why proving, P versus NP problem?, v4vijayakumar
  • Re: Why proving, P versus NP problem?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Why proving, P versus NP problem?, Michael
    • Re: Why proving, P versus NP problem?, OwlHoot
    • Re: Why proving, P versus NP problem?, OwlHoot
• for Lee Rudolph, Philips
• what's the condition for the product of first derivative to equate the second derivative?, Mike
  • Re: what's the condition for the product of first derivative to equate the second derivative?, William Elliot
    • Re: what's the condition for the product of first derivative to equate the second derivative?, Rod
  • Re: what's the condition for the product of first derivative to equate the second derivative?, Freiddy
• Easy Question - Factorising Algebraic Equations, Anthony
  • Re: Easy Question - Factorising Algebraic Equations, hagman
• need intuition for exponent-0, studylogic06@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Virgil
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, postmortes
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, caos . snow
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Freiddy
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, v4vijayakumar
    • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Freiddy
      • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Temp
      • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Freiddy
      • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Virgil
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Temp
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Michael Stemper
  • Re: need intuition for exponent-0, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• peculiar digits problem, sean_in_cali
  • Re: peculiar digits problem, Virgil
  • Re: peculiar digits problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: peculiar digits problem, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: peculiar digits problem, Michael Harrington
  • Re: peculiar digits problem, James Waldby
• Simple Algebraic Expression, Anthony
  • Re: Simple Algebraic Expression, William Elliot
• Streak Probability, Upper West Side Slim
  • Re: Streak Probability, James Waldby
• JSH: Correction not fully tested, Bad Math\(s\)
• Elementary Statistics, Linear1983
  • Re: Elementary Statistics, David Marcus
    • Re: Elementary Statistics, William Elliot
      • Re: Elementary Statistics, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Elementary Statistics, bert
    • Message not available
      • Re: Elementary Statistics, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Elementary Statistics, Randy Poe
• Sets are Windows!, zuhair
  • Re: Sets are Windows!, Dan Christensen
    • Re: Sets are Windows!, zuhair
  • Re: Sets are Windows!, MoeBlee
  • Re: Sets are Windows!, MoeBlee
• JSH Wisconsin man is among several to survive high falls, seeks reunion with hsi pet duck., Dr. V I Plankenstein
• Re: Seemingly Simple Problem, junoexpress
• working out the number of customers over ten year period, windandwaves
  • Re: working out the number of customers over ten year period, Randy Poe
    • Re: working out the number of customers over ten year period, windandwaves
  • Re: working out the number of customers over ten year period, matt271829-news
    • Re: working out the number of customers over ten year period, windandwaves
• Nonstandardization in mathematical terminology, Charles Wells
  • Re: Nonstandardization in mathematical terminology, William Elliot
  • Re: Nonstandardization in mathematical terminology, G. A. Edgar
• Re: Abbreviating (forall x in A) to (forall x) if (x in A) is agreed, and adding a condition to a statement, MoeBlee
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Abbreviating (forall x in A) to (forall x) if (x in A) is agreed, and adding a condition to a statement, G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Re: Abbreviating (forall x in A) to (forall x) if (x in A) is agreed, and adding a condition to a statement, MoeBlee
    • Message not available
      • Re: Abbreviating (forall x in A) to (forall x) if (x in A) is agreed, and adding a condition to a statement, G . Frege
      • Re: Abbreviating (forall x in A) to (forall x) if (x in A) is agreed, and adding a condition to a statement, MoeBlee
      • Re: Abbreviating (forall x in A) to (forall x) if (x in A) is agreed, and adding a condition to a statement, G . Frege
• Re: Communications in Algebra, Jonathan Groves
• Max Kelly, Gerry Myerson
• JSH: We need help from you, now thank please, Jam Zambina
• Re: Rupert's Moronic Proposal To Outlaw Circumcision At Birth (Was: The case for circumcision), openthebaydoors
• complex numbers, jennifer
  • Re: complex numbers, Bart Goddard
  • Re: complex numbers, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: complex numbers, Michael Olea
    • Re: complex numbers, Michael Olea
  • Re: complex numbers, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • complex numbers, jennifer
• Re: JSH: Cliff fall dog survives unscathed, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
• defining inverse number, Aloha Kakuikanu
  • Re: defining inverse number, Kobu
  • Re: defining inverse number, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: defining inverse number, William Elliot
• Re: Explicit Solution of cos(x)=x, Narasimham
  • Re: Explicit Solution of cos(x)=x, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: Explicit Solution of cos(x)=x, David W . Cantrell
• Re: Secret Technology of THERMATE and 911 Crime, fusion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Secret Technology of THERMATE and 911 Crime, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Homeomorphism of space., Patt
• Quadratic Forms, maximum, Kobu
  • Re: Quadratic Forms, maximum, Fedor
• UBasic with Windows Vista, Nomen Nescio
• TI 84 vs HP calc?, me
  • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, me
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Virgil
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, me
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Virgil
    • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Justin
  • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Justin
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Justin
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, conover
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, conover
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Justin
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, conover
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, David Marcus
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Michael Jørgensen
  • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, Dave Seaman
    • Re: TI 84 vs HP calc?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Quadratic form, pawko
  • Re: Quadratic form, Virgil
  • Re: Quadratic form, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• A very stupid question about wavelet., richard2008wang
• A really great math help website, JoelR
• Family of curves, Kristen W Carlson
  • Re: Family of curves, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: Family of curves, Robert Israel
• New Way to Search the Information - Ogleo.com - An Integrated Search, Shaine
• Explicit solution of cos(x)=x, Filipe
  • Re: Explicit solution of cos(x)=x, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Explicit solution of cos(x)=x, Chip Eastham
  • Message not available
    • Re: Explicit solution of cos(x)=x, Rob Johnson
  • Re: Explicit solution of cos(x)=x, Herman Rubin
• Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, toni . lassila
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, Andy Smith
      • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, G . Frege
      • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, fjmd1a
      • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, G . Frege
      • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Elliott thanks for helping me, Marc Olschok
• Angle Bisector Theorem, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Angle Bisector Theorem, William Shanley
    • Re: Angle Bisector Theorem, Thomas Mautsch
• Number of binary search trees, Sourabh
  • Re: Number of binary search trees, Daniel Mayost
    • Re: Number of binary search trees, Sourabh
      • Re: Number of binary search trees, Thomas Mautsch
• Re: Method of checking 'consistency' of three arbitrary sets, Jesse F. Hughes
• minimum of a function with constraints, godles2
  • Re: minimum of a function with constraints, Randy Poe
• Roots of a multivariate polynomial, hmobahi
  • Re: Roots of a multivariate polynomial, hagman
    • Re: Roots of a multivariate polynomial, hagman
      • Re: Roots of a multivariate polynomial, hmobahi
      • Re: Roots of a multivariate polynomial, hmobahi
• pseudo Whitney, Philips
• Simple boundary point and Caratheodory theorem, eugene
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Simple boundary point and Caratheodory theorem, eugene
• Re: My definiton of A subset B was correct., William Elliot
  • Message not available
    • Re: My definiton of A subset B was correct., William Elliot
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: My definiton of A subset B was correct., G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Re: My definiton of A subset B was correct., G . Frege
• Exact Solution, Gerry
  • Re: Exact Solution, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Exact Solution, Gerry
      • Re: Exact Solution, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Exact Solution, Gerry
      • Re: Exact Solution, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Exact Solution, Gerry
      • Re: Exact Solution, David W . Cantrell
• Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
  • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
  • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
  • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, David C . Ullrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
  • Re: Proof that x in Delta_(i=i)^(n) A_i iff x in A_i for an odd number of values of i, G . Frege
• JHS: Will James Harris types please reply to this?, Targata School
• A cubic is a torus, Kira Yamato
  • Re: A cubic is a torus, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: A cubic is a torus, Lee Rudolph
• Q: Multiplication in a 2-category(Baez's page), groups . 5 . pris
• Re: Fox News - 9/11: The Israeli Connection - NOW CENSORED!!! It was pulled off FOX website 2 days after it aired in Dec 2001 and they never referred to it again. MEMORY HOLED!!!, I eat worms
  • Re: Fox News - 9/11: The Israeli Connection - NOW CENSORED!!! It was pulled off FOX website 2 days after it aired in Dec 2001 and they never referred to it again. MEMORY HOLED!!!, Jon Slaughter
• theta function, rancid moth
  • Re: theta function, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: theta function, Robert Israel
    • Re: theta function, rancid moth
  • Re: theta function, Paul Abbott
    • Re: theta function, rancid moth
• The Human Skin as "An Engine", newstips6706
• Re: Announcement: New release of free online calculator, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, David T. Ashley
  • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, David T. Ashley
  • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Aircraft Scaling Problem / Question, Dan Christensen
• how to prove measurable from approximation property, phil . f . wang
  • Re: how to prove measurable from approximation property, José Carlos Santos
• to get fitness, snowighte
• please read it, snowighte
• Re: Gentzen's "constructivism", T.H. Ray
• RFID, openthebaydoors
  • Re: RFID, Hampton Din
  • Re: RFID, Jon Slaughter
• An inequality, TCL
  • Re: An inequality, Daniel Mayost
  • Re: An inequality, The World Wide Wade
• Create Equation for Graph, googlinggoogler@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Create Equation for Graph, Hampton Din
• Re: Kant and the A Priori, fernando revilla
• Algebraic extensions, Yoyontzin
  • Re: Algebraic extensions, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Algebraic extensions, Yoyontzin
      • Re: Algebraic extensions, Yoyontzin
      • [] Algebraic extensions, William Elliot
• set question, bikrant
  • Re: set question, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: set question, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: set question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set question, Dave L. Renfro
      • [OT] Re: set question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: [OT] Re: set question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set question, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: set question, Randy Poe
      • Re: set question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set question, Robert Israel
      • Re: set question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set question, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: set question, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: set question, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: set question, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: set question, William Elliot
      • Re: set question, David C . Ullrich
• maximum function, g_asi2
  • Re: maximum function, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: maximum function, Chip Eastham
  • Re: maximum function, user923005
  • Re: maximum function, user923005
  • Re: maximum function, Chip Eastham
    • Re: maximum function, user923005
      • Re: maximum function, Chip Eastham
      • Re: maximum function, g_asi2
  • Message not available
    • Re: maximum function, Chip Eastham
      • Re: maximum function, g_asi2
• A least-square porblem, François Grondin
  • Re: A least-square porblem, Ian Parker
    • Re: A least-square problem, François Grondin
  • Re: A least-square porblem, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: A least-square problem, François Grondin
      • Re: A least-square problem, Jon Slaughter
• frequency analysis of long transient signal, richard2008wang
  • Re: frequency analysis of long transient signal, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: frequency analysis of long transient signal, richard2008wang
• Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed", Chip Eastham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed", Peter_Smith
  • Re: "The mathematical universe is strongly typed", Chip Eastham
• Matrix library for Visual C++, pauldepstein
• Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, Benjamin A. Bartsch
  • Re: Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, Benjamin A. Bartsch
  • Re: Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, TefJlives
    • Re: Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, Benjamin A. Bartsch
      • Re: Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, TefJlives
  • Re: Simple Polygon (Triangle) Decomposition, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, William Elliot
  • Message not available
    • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, William Elliot
      • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, Denis Feldmann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
    • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, Denis Feldmann
      • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, Denis Feldmann
    • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
  • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
    • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
    • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
  • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, David C . Ullrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, David C. Ullrich
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
      • Re: Interesting problem on symmetric difference, G . Frege
• sum(1/binomial(n,k), k=0..n), Justinver
  • Re: sum(1/binomial(n,k), k=0..n), Denis Feldmann
    • Re: sum(1/binomial(n,k), k=0..n), Justinver
    • Re: sum(1/binomial(n,k), k=0..n), Herman Rubin
      • Re: sum(1/binomial(n,k), k=0..n), Denis Feldmann
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 29, 2007, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, eugene
  • Re: Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, jane
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, eugene
    • Re: Holomorphic mapping from Riemann sphere to elliptic curve, Hagen
• geometric inequality, guillaume07
  • Re: geometric inequality, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: geometric inequality, guillaume07
• Reference for Dini's theorems, guillaume . aubrnu
  • Re: Reference for Dini's theorems, ArtflDodgr
    • Re: Reference for Dini's theorems, guillaume . aubrnu
• How to solve this differential equation (second order) ?, guillaume07
  • Re: How to solve this differential equation (second order) ?, Rod
    • Re: How to solve this differential equation (second order) ?, guillaume07
• Re: Can we influence the past?, LauLuna
• How to solve this natural log problem?, amy_burton2007
  • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, meznaric
  • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Rob Johnson
  • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Ioannis
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Ioannis
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Ioannis
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, David W . Cantrell
      • Message not available
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Rob Johnson
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Badger
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Badger
      • Message not available
      • Re: How to solve this natural log problem?, Rob Johnson
• Re: Quantum Voodoo? Spooky telepathic messages back from the future?, antonio scotti
• number with maximum, minimum, mina_world
  • Re: number with maximum, minimum, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: number with maximum, minimum, mina_world
  • Re: number with maximum, minimum, fishfry
  • Re: number with maximum, minimum, Paul Abbott
  • Message not available
    • Re: number with maximum, minimum, Rob Johnson
      • Re: number with maximum, minimum, mina_world
      • Re: number with maximum, minimum, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: number with maximum, minimum, Virgil
• hi..can yu help me find the solution to the following recurrence?, sarah
  • Re: hi..can yu help me find the solution to the following recurrence?, Daniel Mayost
    • Re: hi..can yu help me find the solution to the following recurrence?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: hi..can yu help me find the solution to the following recurrence?, Sourabh
    • Re: hi..can yu help me find the solution to the following recurrence?, Sourabh
• Complex Variable, Juan Barrios
  • Re: Complex Variable, Daniel Mayost
  • Re: Complex Variable, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Complex Variable, Paul Abbott
• Dual and Tensor Product, Yoyontzin
  • Re: Dual and Tensor Product, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Dual and Tensor Product, Yoyontzin
      • Re: Dual and Tensor Product, Yoyontzin
• ***Save money on your taxes****, mailjob1
• I want to cook and eat American women!!!, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: I want to cook and eat American women!!!, sg552
    • Re: I want to cook and eat American women!!!, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: I want to cook and eat American women!!!, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: I want to cook and eat American women!!!, Arturo Magidin
• Euler's Brick, Tim Roberts
• groups of order 6, paul12
  • Re: groups of order 6, José Carlos Santos
• basic group ?, paul12
  • Re: basic group ?, José Carlos Santos
• Scaling three-dimensional planes, kemo33
  • Re: Scaling three-dimensional planes, Michael Harrington
• Uncountable closed subspaces of a set of aleph_1 with minimal well-ordering are homeomorphic, BP
  • Re: Uncountable closed subspaces of a set of aleph_1 with minimal well-ordering are homeomorphic, William Elliot
• isotropy subgroups and group orbits, figurt
  • Re: isotropy subgroups and group orbits, Arturo Magidin
• Confused by linear algebra (invariant factors and characteristic poly), stonemcstone
  • Re: Confused by linear algebra (invariant factors and characteristic poly), Paul Sperry
• Simple Test of postability., Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Simple Test of postability., William Elliot
• Not so simple matrix problem?, Chris
  • Re: Not so simple matrix problem?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Not so simple matrix problem?, Robert Israel
• Secure and jazz up ur system- free Download essential software at www.i-search.co.in, sftwrpro
• Polynomial approximation with constraints, elvis_costello79
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Polynomial approximation with constraints, elvis_costello79
    • Re: Polynomial approximation with constraints, Chip Eastham
• Re: probability, Don Del Grande
  • Re: probability, Jules
    • Re: probability, Don Del Grande
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: probability, A N Niel
  • Re: probability, dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: probability, A N Niel
      • Re: probability, dvsarwate@xxxxxxxxx
  • Probability, Thomas
    • Re: Probability, Michael Harrington
      • Re: Probability, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Algebraic number theory problem, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Algebraic number theory problem, hagman
• Mathematical Modeling in Finance, dear . jjl
  • Re: Mathematical Modeling in Finance, rip pelletier
  • Re: Mathematical Modeling in Finance, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Mathematical Modeling in Finance, Michael
• What is the difference between regular and Hausdorff space?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: What is the difference between regular and Hausdorff space?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: What is the difference between regular and Hausdorff space?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• a series, argwella
  • Re: a series, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: a series, Robert Israel
      • Re: a series, David Bernier
    • Re: a series, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: a series, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: a series, David Bernier
• Silly problem, Frederik Vanderstraeten
  • Re: Silly problem, Badger
    • Re: Silly problem, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Silly problem, Badger
    • Re: Silly problem, Frederik Vanderstraeten
    • Re: Silly problem, Gerard Schildberger
      • Re: Silly problem, Frederik Vanderstraeten
  • Re: Silly problem, Don Del Grande
  • Re: Silly problem, Virgil
• Re: Please ignore all of my articles upto January 28th, 2007 and also any articles that I may post before February 28th, 2007, Dr. V I Plankenstein
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Please ignore all of my articles upto January 28th, 2007 and also any articles that I may post before February 28th, 2007, LauLuna
• PDE to solve..., jonathan . ethier
  • Re: PDE to solve..., Fedor
  • Re: PDE to solve..., Jon Slaughter
• unbounded functional, Fedor
  • Re: unbounded functional, Robert Israel
    • Re: unbounded functional, Fedor
• A simple high school arithmetic with polynomials (over rings), Jose Capco
  • Re: A simple high school arithmetic with polynomials (over rings), Jannick Asmus
    • Re: A simple high school arithmetic with polynomials (over rings), Chip Eastham
    • Re: A simple high school arithmetic with polynomials (over rings), hagman
  • Re: A simple high school arithmetic with polynomials (over rings), Chip Eastham
    • Re: A simple high school arithmetic with polynomials (over rings), Jose Capco
• Univalent extension, Mate
  • Re: Univalent extension, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Univalent extension, Mate
  • Re: Univalent extension, The World Wide Wade
• Re: 'All things are such that if A then B' is inferior to 'All A is B', William Elliot
  • Re: 'All things are such that if A then B' is inferior to 'All A is B', G . Frege
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 'All things are such that if A then B' is inferior to 'All A is B', David C . Ullrich
• The Harem-problem, Frank Cornelis
  • Re: The Harem-problem, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: The Harem-problem, Alfred Flaßhaar
  • Re: The Harem-problem, Bob Kolker
    • Re: The Harem-problem, Frank Cornelis
  • Re: The Harem-problem, Herman Rubin
  • Re: The Harem-problem, matt271829-news
    • Re: The Harem-problem, Frank Cornelis
      • Re: The Harem-problem, matt271829-news
• Re: A subset B, Fuckwit
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A subset B, David Bernier
• How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Nhat
  • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Nhat
      • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, toni . lassila
      • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, toni . lassila
    • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, toni . lassila
  • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, hagman
  • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Nhat
    • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, toni . lassila
      • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Nhat
    • Re: How to find nonnegative orthogonal basis?, Robert Israel
• what is the inverse of the following function?, sean_in_cali
  • Re: what is the inverse of the following function?, sean_in_cali
    • Re: what is the inverse of the following function?, newt
  • Re: what is the inverse of the following function?, K S
  • Re: what is the inverse of the following function?, karl
  • Re: what is the inverse of the following function?, William Elliot
• difficult recurrence relation, crosstalk
  • Re: difficult recurrence relation, Alfred Flaßhaar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • difficult recurrence relation, crosstalk
    • Re: difficult recurrence relation, David W . Cantrell
• A help to prove these polynomials have no rational roots, nicegirl_130
  • Re: A help to prove these polynomials have no rational roots, Chip Eastham
    • Re: A help to prove these polynomials have no rational roots, Chip Eastham
      • Re: A help to prove these polynomials have no rational roots, Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • A help to prove these polynomials have no rational roots, nicegirl_130
• positive definite function?? what is it?, VijaKhara
  • Re: positive definite function?? what is it?, The Last Danish Pastry
• embed RP^3 into R^5, athan
• Scheme of Replacement: two versions, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Scheme of Replacement: two versions, G . Frege
    • Re: Scheme of Replacement: two versions, G . Frege
  • Re: Scheme of Replacement: two versions, G . Frege
• How do I find a minimal polynomial?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: How do I find a minimal polynomial?, Klueless
  • Message not available
    • Re: How do I find a minimal polynomial?, Rob Johnson
  • Re: How do I find a minimal polynomial?, mm
  • Re: How do I find a minimal polynomial?, Mate
    • Re: How do I find a minimal polynomial?, Robert Israel
  • Re: How do I find a minimal polynomial?, Paul Abbott
• matrix algebra problem, jraul
  • Re: matrix algebra problem, Daniel Mayost
• Ei(1,x), conradeaton
  • Re: Ei(1,x), Ioannis
    • Re: Ei(1,x), conradeaton
• Explore, ahmad6132
• Re: I have found (for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, Fuckwit
  • Message not available
    • Re: I have found (for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, davidmarcus
      • Message not available
      • Re: I have found (for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, davidmarcus
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: I have found (for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, davidmarcus
      • Re: I have found (for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, G . Frege
• An interesting question about analytical geometry and calculus, Eratosthenes
  • Re: An interesting question about analytical geometry and calculus, Virgil
    • Re: An interesting question about analytical geometry and calculus, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: An interesting question about analytical geometry and calculus, James Waldby
      • Re: An interesting question about analytical geometry and calculus, Virgil
• What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Ioannis
  • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, A N Niel
    • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Ioannis
      • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Klueless
      • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Ioannis
      • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, David Bernier
  • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Robert Israel
  • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Badger
    • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Ioannis
      • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Badger
      • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Ioannis
    • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, junoexpress
  • Re: What units did the ancients use to measure angles?, Herman Rubin
• Don't forget to visit today!, businessjoint
• 2 at the same time, bloggeruser55555
• Plotting points around a circle, Carl Gilbert
  • Re: Plotting points around a circle, James Waldby
• Re: I have found(for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: I have found(for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, G . Frege
    • Message not available
      • Re: I have found(for myself) the best formalized definition of A subset B, David C . Ullrich
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Disprove one point from my explanation to convince me why unrestricted form is better definition of A subset B than the restricted form, William Elliot
      • Message not available
      • Re: Disprove one point from my explanation to convince me why unrestricted form is better definition of A subset B than the restricted form, davidmarcus
      • Re: Disprove one point from my explanation to convince me why unrestricted form is better definition of A subset B than the restricted form, G . Frege
      • Re: Disprove one point from my explanation to convince me why unrestricted form is better definition of A subset B than the restricted form, William Elliot
      • Message not available
      • Re: Disprove one point from my explanation to convince me why unrestricted form is better definition of A subset B than the restricted form, William Elliot
• advice on approach for discrete maximization problem, fxn
  • Re: advice on approach for discrete maximization problem, fxn
• unknown notation, Philips
• det(A+ tB), caos . snow
  • Re: det(A+ tB), caos . snow
    • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Ronald Bruck
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Gib Bogle
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Denis Feldmann
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
  • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
  • Re: det(A+ tB), Ronald Bruck
    • Re: det(A+ tB), Ronald Bruck
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Ross A. Finlayson
    • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Ronald Bruck
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), caos . snow
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Denis Feldmann
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Lee Rudolph
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Virgil
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Denis Feldmann
      • Re: det(A+ tB), Jon Slaughter
• Summation of Stirling-numbers ?, Gottfried Helms
• Discrete subgroup of PSL_2(R), eugene
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Discrete subgroup of PSL_2(R), eugene
• proper, Sauro
  • Re: proper, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: proper, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: proper, Sauro
• Re: Probably the last question on basic set theory for today, William Elliot
• Re: Typo error correction, William Elliot
• Re: I have a question on binding a variable to a set, William Elliot
• Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, tonyjeffs
  • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, hagman
    • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, tonyjeffs
      • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, tonyjeffs
      • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, tonyjeffs
      • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, hagman
      • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Which is largest; infinity or infinity/2?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• ? basis and dim of trajectory, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? basis and dim of trajectory, Cheng Cosine
• base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Kobu
  • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, William Elliot
    • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Kobu
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, davidmarcus
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Kobu
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Dave Seaman
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, William Elliot
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, davidmarcus
  • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Herman Rubin
  • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Michael Press
  • Re: base independent constructions of N, Q, R, Michael Stemper
• Does math writing software exist?, me
  • Re: Does math writing software exist?, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: Does math writing software exist?, David T. Ashley
    • Re: Does math writing software exist?, me
      • Re: Does math writing software exist?, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Does math writing software exist?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Does math writing software exist?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
• handasah and siyAq number systems, Allan Adler
• Math riddle, Beady-El
  • Re: Math riddle, drmwecker
  • Re: Math riddle, matt271829-news
    • Re: Math riddle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Math riddle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Math riddle, James Waldby
      • Re: Math riddle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Math riddle, David Bernier
      • Re: Math riddle, gwh
  • Re: Math riddle, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Math riddle, Virgil
  • Re: Math riddle, mathmanjc
  • Re: Math riddle, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Math riddle, Beady-El
• Books on Algebraic Plane Curves, g
  • Re: Books on Algebraic Plane Curves, Omar Rojas
  • Re: Books on Algebraic Plane Curves, Anolethron
• How can I maximize a discrete function?, Tareq
  • Re: How can I maximize a discrete function?, Randy Poe
  • Re: How can I maximize a discrete function?, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: How can I maximize a discrete function?, Chip Eastham
  • Re: How can I maximize a discrete function?, Aloha Kakuikanu
• log(n!), Bart
  • Re: log(n!), [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: log(n!), Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: log(n!), Phil Carmody
• representation of monotone boolean functions, sasha mal
• History of Matrix Math, Bonita
  • Re: History of Matrix Math, alex.lupas
    • Re: History of Matrix Math, alex.lupas
  • Re: History of Matrix Math, James Dolan
    • Re: History of Matrix Math, Bonita
  • Re: History of Matrix Math, Rick Decker
• Re: "Pentagonal" symmetry in Islamic art? (Weyl"s "Symmetry"), Bonita
• equidistant points on a hypotrochoid?, Rip
• Re: Buck and Stirling, Phil Freedenberg
• Complex numbers into reals, Gerry
  • Re: Complex numbers into reals, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Complex numbers into reals, Gerry
      • Re: Complex numbers into reals, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Complex numbers into reals, Gerry
      • Re: Complex numbers into reals, Paul Abbott
      • Re: Complex numbers into reals, Gerry
• about torus, Philips
  • Re: about torus, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: about torus, Philips
      • Re: about torus, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: about torus, Philips
• norm involving C^1 functions, TCL
  • Message not available
    • Re: norm involving C^1 functions, Rob Johnson
  • Re: norm involving C^1 functions, The World Wide Wade
• chain rule for directional derivative, ays
• course angle, kilbinge
• Re: what is the probability of achieving immortality?, Eratosthenes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what is the probability of achieving immortality?, gubernacullum
    • Re: what is the probability of achieving immortality?, gubernacullum
  • Re: what is the probability of achieving immortality?, samantha_bond2
    • Re: what is the probability of achieving immortality?, gubernacullum
• What's the mathematics behind bailing out?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: What's the mathematics behind bailing out?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: What's the mathematics behind bailing out?, Phil Carmody
• Prime theorem, Elefun McConaughey
  • Re: Prime theorem, William Elliot
  • Re: Prime theorem, Pubkeybreaker
• Simple eigenvalue question, axwse
  • Re: Simple eigenvalue question, Mathematician
  • Re: Simple eigenvalue question, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Simple eigenvalue question, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Simple eigenvalue question, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Simple eigenvalue question, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Simple eigenvalue question, fernando revilla
• Re: Storage thread for things I understand, William Elliot
  • Message not available
    • Re: Storage thread for things I understand, William Elliot
  • Re: Storage thread for things I understand, G . Frege
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Storage thread for things I understand, David C . Ullrich
• Problem with radical Ideals, Azumanga
  • Re: Problem with radical Ideals, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Problem with radical Ideals, Jannick Asmus
• Looking for a book, archer1231
  • Re: Looking for a book, Rick Decker
• A mathematical searchengine ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
  • Re: A mathematical searchengine ?, Robert Israel
  • Re: A mathematical searchengine ?, Paul Abbott
    • Re: A mathematical searchengine ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
    • Re: A mathematical searchengine ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
• JSH: Single star rating, jstevh
  • Re: Single star rating, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: Single star rating, jstevh
      • Re: Single star rating, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Single star rating, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Single star rating, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Single star rating, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Single star rating, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Single star rating, Richard Tobin
      • Re: Single star rating, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Single star rating, galathaea
      • Re: Single star rating, Jason Pawloski
      • Re: Single star rating, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Single star rating, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Single star rating, David Bernier
      • Re: Single star rating, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Single star rating, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Single star rating, Hawk
      • Re: Single star rating, sg552
      • Re: Single star rating, junoexpress
      • Re: Single star rating, junoexpress
  • Re: JSH: Single star rating, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Single star rating, Hawk
  • Re: JSH: Single star rating, gjedwards
  • Re: JSH: Single star rating, drmwecker
  • Re: JSH: Single star rating, drmwecker
    • Re: JSH: Single star rating, drmwecker
    • Re: JSH: Single star rating, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Single star rating, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: JSH: Single star rating, sg552
      • Re: JSH: Single star rating, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Single star rating, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Single star rating, Eratosthenes
  • Re: Single star rating, Hawk
• OT, Taliban Olympics, Larry Hammick
• Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Red
  • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Andrew Usher
    • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Red
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Rupert
    • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Andrew Usher
      • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Rupert
      • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Andrew Usher
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Andrew Usher
  • Re: Rupert the disingenuous coward, Rupert
• Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
  • Message not available
    • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
      • Re: Basic set theory question, Fuckwit
      • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Basic set theory question, Fuckwit
    • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, Fuckwit
    • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
    • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
  • Re: Basic set theory question, Fuckwit
  • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
    • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
      • Re: Basic set theory question, Victor Eijkhout
      • Re: Basic set theory question, G . Frege
      • Re: Basic set theory question, William Elliot
  • Re: Basic set theory question, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Basic set theory question, Dave Seaman
    • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, Dave Seaman
      • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, David C . Ullrich
      • Message not available
      • Re: Basic set theory question, David C . Ullrich
• Jack Sarfatti's Pit-stop and the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
  • Re: Jack Sarfatti's Pit-stop and the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Hawk
    • Re: Jack Sarfatti's Pit-stop and the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: Jack Sarfatti's Pit-stop and the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Hawk
• What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, theheartwillwin
  • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, Tom Smith
    • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, OwlHoot
      • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, A N Niel
  • Re: What is the largest ratio for consecutive primes?, Ray Johnstone
• Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, Michael Olea
  • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, William Elliot
    • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, Michael Olea
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, Mitch
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, The Qurqirish Dragon
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, galathaea
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, Michael Olea
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, se16
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, William Elliot
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, Michael Olea
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, William Elliot
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, Michael Olea
      • Re: Integer Partitions: In Search of a Metric, kunzmilan
• Jack Sarfatti's Fartless Drive and the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Re: Halting problem totally unsolvable?, mike3
• Jack Sarfatti's Fartless Propulsion & the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
  • Re: Jack Sarfatti's Fartless Propulsion & the Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Leo
  • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot
    • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, fishfry
      • [] Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot
  • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
  • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
    • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, davidmarcus
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Peter Webb
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, William Elliot
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, davidmarcus
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Rational Numbers/Irrational Numbers, Virgil
• Variance of non-normal/Gaussian distributed elements, conover
• Universal Integer Theorem.By Aiya-Oba, Anthony A. Aiya-Oba
• A new conjecture about primes?, Danny
  • Re: A new conjecture about primes?, Danny
• Basic Probability Self-Study: Please comment on a proof, Marc
  • Re: Basic Probability Self-Study: Please comment on a proof, Michael
  • Re: Basic Probability Self-Study: Please comment on a proof, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Basic Probability Self-Study: Please comment on a proof, Marc
• Have Governments stopped passing out psychotropic drugs to sci.math posters?, amzoti
  • Message not available
    • Re: Have Governments stopped passing out psychotropic drugs to sci.math posters?, Hawk
  • Re: Have Governments stopped passing out psychotropic drugs to sci.math posters?, galathaea
    • Re: Have Governments stopped passing out psychotropic drugs to sci.math posters?, galathaea
• Jack Sarfatti's Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, Martin Winer
  • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, Martin Winer
      • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, Martin Winer
      • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, junoexpress
      • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, Martin Winer
      • Re: My prime counting, understanding forms, Martin Winer
• Location of the atoms of the Mandelbrot set, Henning Kühn
• Robert Maas' Reanimated League of Crotchety Older Men, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Question About Typesetting, Jonathan Groves
  • Re: Question About Typesetting, Arturo Magidin
• summation and integral equality, vsgdp
  • Re: summation and integral equality, Daniel Mayost
• A card game probability, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A card game probability, A N Niel
  • Re: A card game probability, Hamk
    • Re: A card game probability, DOD
      • Re: A card game probability, Hamk
      • Re: A card game probability, DOD
      • Re: A card game probability, Hawk
      • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
  • Message not available
    • Re: A card game probability, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A card game probability, Michael Stemper
  • Re: A card game probability, Peter Webb
  • Re: A card game probability, Nick
    • Message not available
      • Re: A card game probability, Rob Johnson
      • Re: A card game probability, Nick
      • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
  • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
    • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
      • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
      • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
      • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
      • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
      • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
      • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
      • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
      • Re: A card game probability, David Bernier
      • Re: A card game probability, Faton Berisha
      • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
      • Re: A card game probability, matt271829-news
      • Re: A card game probability, David Bernier
  • Re: A card game probability, bill
  • Re: A card game probability, George Marsaglia
  • Re: A card game probability, Michael Press
    • Re: A card game probability, David Bernier
      • Re: A card game probability, Michael Press
• Scholars move to new area of artificial intelligence, MQ
  • Re: Scholars move to new area of artificial intelligence, Hamk
• solving quadratic equations involving complex numbers, jennifer
  • Re: solving quadratic equations involving complex numbers, Ioannis
• JSH: out of steam, Bob A
  • Re: JSH: out of steam, sg552
    • Re: JSH: out of steam, jstevh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: out of steam, Hawk
      • Re: JSH: out of steam, Robert Stephens
• Finitely additive becoming countably additive, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Finitely additive becoming countably additive, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Finitely additive becoming countably additive, The Cool Giraffe
    • Re: Finitely additive becoming countably additive, The Cool Giraffe
      • Re: Finitely additive becoming countably additive, Herman Rubin
• Re: what is the Chernoff distance?, Rob Johnson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: what is the Chernoff distance?, Herman Rubin
• primes and non-prime numbers, salih.as.istanbul@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • primes and non-prime numbers, salih.as.istanbul@xxxxxxxxx
  • primes and non-prime numbers, salih.as.istanbul@xxxxxxxxx
• Can the Coriolis force be explained by a property of manifolds, Jon Slaughter
• a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, ays
  • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, ays
    • Message not available
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, ays
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, ays
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, ays
      • Re: a question about directional derivative and generalized gradient, ays
• Lipschitz continuous function, ays
  • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, Oleg
    • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, The World Wide Wade
  • Message not available
    • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, The World Wide Wade
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, ays
  • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, Oleg
  • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Lipschitz continuous function, David C . Ullrich
• number with interval., mina_world
  • Re: number with interval., bluelabel
  • Re: number with interval., hagman
    • Re: number with interval., bluelabel
      • Re: number with interval., Doh
      • Re: number with interval., bluelabel
    • Re: number with interval., mina_world
      • Re: number with interval., bill
• algebra with order 160., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with order 160., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra with order 160., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with order 160., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra with order 160., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with order 160., Jim Heckman
• A family of Markov Chains, Michael Knudsen
• Q on Borel sets, Gonçalo Rodrigues
  • Re: Q on Borel sets, Daniel Grubb
    • Re: Q on Borel sets, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Q on Borel sets, Daniel Grubb
      • Re: Q on Borel sets, Herman Rubin
• Circuit, Elefun McConaughey
  • Re: Circuit, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Algebraic indepence, xavier Kolhe
  • Re: Algebraic indepence, elefun5855
  • Re: Algebraic indepence, David C . Ullrich
• divisibility problem, sean_in_cali
  • Re: divisibility problem, Bob Kolker
    • Re: divisibility problem, sean_in_cali
      • Re: divisibility problem, Tim Peters
      • Re: divisibility problem, bi
• Business Cards Express, webmediaMI@xxxxxxxxx
• Statistics Basics Question 2, NPDave
  • Re: Statistics Basics Question 2, Nick
• Quant jobs (computational finance), vincent64@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: teachers of mathematics making threats and inciting death; Robert Maas, Tonico
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: teachers of mathematics making threats and inciting death; Robert Maas, Dave L. Renfro
• Check out ebooks free download at www.i-search.co.in, sftwrpro
• Cancellation property, Domagoj Babic
  • Re: Cancellation property, James Waldby
    • Re: Cancellation property, Domagoj Babic
      • Re: Cancellation property, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Cancellation property, Domagoj Babic
• need help finding a class project(comp. geometry and cryptography), forums
  • SBPA attack, Zbigniew Karno
• Reflection, Light & properties of "The Invisible" [ Physics ], morpheus123
• unsolved problems web site, Tim Roberts
• Having problem with proving something.., NeedHelpGeometry
  • Re: Having problem with proving something.., Gerry Myerson
• An ordering of sequences of naturals, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: An ordering of sequences of naturals, James Waldby
    • Re: An ordering of sequences of naturals, James Waldby
    • Re: An ordering of sequences of naturals, Robert Israel
  • Re: An ordering of sequences of naturals, Ross
• SAVE MONEY FILING YOUR TAXES!!!!, mailjob1
• Efficient Engines - [ Engineering ], newstips6706
• Simple Probability Question, Thomas
  • Re: Simple Probability Question, mathman
    • Re: Simple Probability Question, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Simple Probability Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• a question related to Waring's problem, David Bernier
  • Re: a question related to Waring's problem, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: a question related to Waring's problem, David Bernier
      • Re: a question related to Waring's problem, Gerry Myerson
• "Almost" Field, Jules
  • Re: "Almost" Field, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: "Almost" Field, Jules
      • Re: "Almost" Field, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: "Almost" Field, Dave Seaman
• for donnie: truly superb music - amwa - (1/1), adelbert
• Re: Gentzen on Wikipedia, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Gentzen on Wikipedia, J.M.
    • Re: Gentzen on Wikipedia, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Gentzen on Wikipedia, G . Frege
• hi...Order Notation Problem..., sarah
  • Re: hi...Order Notation Problem..., Daniel Mayost
• Re: Reverse Cantor Diagonal Method to prove Counting Numbers are Uncountable Re: #2# book, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Construction of 3 connected planar cubic graph, babu
• Re: Lubos Motl's forced resignation from Harvard University Physics Department, Amadeus Polonium-210
• help needed, Kevin Whynot
  • Re: help needed, matt271829-news
• Statistics Basics, NPDave
  • Re: Statistics Basics, matt271829-news
    • Re: Statistics Basics, NPDave
  • Re: Statistics Basics, David Marcus
  • Message not available
    • Re: Statistics Basics, matt271829-news
      • Message not available
      • Re: Statistics Basics, matt271829-news
      • Re: Statistics Basics, Nick
      • Re: Statistics Basics, David Marcus
      • Re: Statistics Basics, Nick
      • Re: Statistics Basics, Michael Jørgensen
      • Re: Statistics Basics, Michael Jørgensen
      • Re: Statistics Basics, Nick
• Re: Internet Explorer hijacked, gwh
  • Re: Internet Explorer hijacked, matt271829-news
  • Re: Internet Explorer hijacked, Michael Press
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Internet Explorer hijacked, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• problem involving integration by parts, woodland
  • Re: problem involving integration by parts, Lori
  • Re: problem involving integration by parts, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Inverse galois theory, Anolethron
  • Re: Inverse galois theory, Zbigniew Karno
  • Re: Inverse galois theory, Anolethron
• s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Bart
  • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Daniel Grubb
    • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Bart
      • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Daniel Grubb
      • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Bart
    • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Bart
    • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates-, JEMebius
    • Re: s-dimensional spherical coordinates, Bart
• Calulation help - reforming calculation, Ben
  • Re: Calulation help - reforming calculation, Rick Decker
• Finite fields and model theory, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Finite fields and model theory, Allan Adler
    • Re: Finite fields and model theory, jseppa17@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Finite fields and model theory, Allan Adler
• Bitwise 2K7 - An Algorithm Intensive Time Constrained Online Programming Competition., romram
• When is (z^w)^u <> z^(w*u)?, Eric Fennessey
  • Re: When is (z^w)^u <> z^(w*u)?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: When is (z^w)^u <> z^(w*u)?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: When is (z^w)^u <> z^(w*u)?, Robert Israel
• Re: Need help with basic set theory notation, Arturo Magidin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Need help with basic set theory notation, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Need help with basic set theory notation, Arturo Magidin
• Re: Uncomputable numbers are all in your head, Randy Poe
• algebra with Sylow., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with Sylow., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with Sylow., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra with Sylow., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with Sylow., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra with Sylow., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with Sylow., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra with Sylow., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra with Sylow., mina_world
    • Re: algebra with Sylow., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with Sylow., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra with Sylow., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with Sylow., Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: algebra with Sylow., Jim Heckman
• Reviewing localization of rings, Jose Capco
  • Re: Reviewing localization of rings, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Reviewing localization of rings, Jose Capco
      • Re: Reviewing localization of rings, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Reviewing localization of rings, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Reviewing localization of rings, Arturo Magidin
• Is it possible? And how?, Travelmate
  • Re: Is it possible? And how?, Michael Jørgensen
    • Re: Is it possible? And how?, Travelmate
      • Re: Is it possible? And how?, Michael Jørgensen
• Need help with topology and such., ttl_idiot
• Re: *5* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; Cosmic blackbody microwave radiation, Red
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: *5* new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS" ; Cosmic blackbody microwave radiation, Red
• Threshold Models and New Developments in Time Series, Karen Li
• Re: Google fucked up again, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Google fucked up again, Andrew Usher
    • Re: Google fucked up again, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Google fucked up again, galathaea
    • Re: Google fucked up again, Andrew Usher
• Re: Rupert's A FUCKING LIAR!!!!! (Was: The case for circumcision), Rupert
• EpiConvergence & Pointwise Convergence, exponent
  • Re: EpiConvergence & Pointwise Convergence, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: EpiConvergence & Pointwise Convergence, exponent
• Nested Carmichael numbers?, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Nested Carmichael numbers?, Gerry Myerson
• logistic surface, zim_bob
  • Re: logistic surface, lingwanjae
  • Re: logistic surface, Ray Koopman
• editorial policy question, Allan Adler
  • Re: editorial policy question, drmwecker
    • Re: editorial policy question, Allan Adler
      • Re: editorial policy question, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: editorial policy question, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: editorial policy question, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: editorial policy question, Allan Adler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • editorial policy question, Michel PETITJEAN
• analysis integration q, vsgdp
  • Re: analysis integration q, David Marcus
• necessarily, A Aitken
  • Re: necessarily, William Elliot
  • Re: necessarily, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: necessarily, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: necessarily, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: necessarily, Bob Kolker
    • Re: necessarily, Jesse F. Hughes
• Machine Science [ Computer Science / Neuroscience / Computer Systems Engineering ], newstips6706
• stochastic and continuous methods, Jon Slaughter
• riemann-stieltjes question, vsgdp
  • Message not available
    • Re: riemann-stieltjes question, Rob Johnson
• Re: little talk about genius Re: Poincare objection to Cantor? Re: #2 book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics..."; (1) Infinity, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Re: Physics community is a historical laughing stock, Amadeus Polonium-210
• Web site about Carmichael numbers, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Web site about Carmichael numbers, mm
    • Re: Web site about Carmichael numbers, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Web site about Carmichael numbers, mm
• nonnegative matrix decomposition, Nhat
  • Re: nonnegative matrix decomposition, Robert Israel
    • Re: nonnegative matrix decomposition, Nhat
• pi & 2 pi, Freiddy
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, Randy Poe
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: pi & 2 pi, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: pi & 2 pi, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: pi & 2 pi, Freiddy
      • Re: pi & 2 pi, Amadeus Polonium-210
    • Re: pi & 2 pi, davidmarcus
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, user923005
  • Re: pi & 2 pi, Michael Press
    • Re: pi & 2 pi, David R Tribble
      • Re: pi & 2 pi, Michael Press
• analytic vs. algebraic, Luke Wu
  • Re: analytic vs. algebraic, James Dolan
    • Re: analytic vs. algebraic, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: analytic vs. algebraic, Luke Wu
      • Re: analytic vs. algebraic, Robert Israel
      • Re: analytic vs. algebraic, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• newton-raphson method, SomeGuy
  • Re: newton-raphson method, Randy Poe
    • Re: newton-raphson method, user923005
• The Algorithm of Virtual Machines, newstips6706
• hi.all urgent help., sarahsmith11
  • Re: hi.all urgent help., Daniel Mayost
    • Re: hi.all urgent help., sarah
• A problem about Hyphthesis testing, hhwolf76
• Re: The blog on Pc trouble shooting skills,Networking,Linux, Mathematician
• Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, nicegirl_130
  • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, fishfry
      • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, Tom Smith
    • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, briggs
  • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, nicegirl_130
    • [OT] Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, Hero
  • Re: Point at infinity in the extended complex number system, nicegirl_130
• A Gambling Math Question, JyBrdnj
  • Re: A Gambling Math Question, Dave Seaman
    • Message not available
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, Dave Seaman
    • Re: A Gambling Math Question, JyBrdnj
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, matt271829-news
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, JyBrdnj
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, Randy Poe
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, ermutarra
      • Re: A Gambling Math Question, Rob Johnson
• Important question about random number genr, Researcher
  • Re: Important question about random number genr, Researcher
  • Re: Important question about random number genr, David Marcus
• Time complexity, Paul Hosre
  • Re: Time complexity, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Time complexity, David T. Ashley
• algebra with Burnside., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with Burnside., mina_world
    • Re: algebra with Burnside., matt271829-news
• stability of elliptic system, don
• number with Pi., mina_world
  • Message not available
    • Re: number with Pi., Rob Johnson
      • Re: number with Pi., mina_world
  • Re: number with Pi., The World Wide Wade
• Fiber Product of rings, Jose Capco
  • Re: Fiber Product of rings, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Fiber Product of rings, Jose Capco
      • Re: Fiber Product of rings, Jose Capco
• a new method for primality test, rachid baih
  • Re: a new method for primality test, Pubkeybreaker
• Rank or Valence, J. B. Wood
  • Re: Rank or Valence, Oleg
  • Re: Rank or Valence, Oleg
• a new model (Primality test) prime number -, rachid baih
  • Re: a new model (Primality test) prime number -, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: a new model (Primality test) prime number -, Dik T. Winter
• Re: Statistics humor, marian
  • Re: Statistics humor, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Statistics humor, David R Tribble
  • Re: Statistics humor, Randy Poe
    • Re: Statistics humor, Andreas Dieckmann
    • Re: Statistics humor, Robert Israel
      • Statistics humor, William Elliot
      • Re: Statistics humor, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Statistics humor, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Statistics humor, Andy Spragg
      • Re: Statistics humor, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Statistics humor, Andy Spragg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Statistics humor, Phil Freedenberg
    • Re: Statistics humor, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Statistics humor, Randy Poe
      • Re: Statistics humor, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Statistics humor, hagman
      • Re: Statistics humor, David R Tribble
      • Re: Statistics humor, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Statistics humor, fernando revilla
    • Re: Statistics humor, davidmarcus
      • Re: Statistics humor, fernando revilla
• a 50 $ question on primes, marian
  • Re: a 50 $ question on primes, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: a 50 $ question on primes, Tim Peters
    • Re: a 50 $ question on primes, Phil Carmody
  • Re: a 50 $ question on primes, marian
    • Re: a 50 $ question on primes, Tim Peters
• Funny expression of sum of infinite number of bernoulli-numbers/zeta-values as finite harmonic series / correction, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Funny expression of sum of infinite number of bernoulli-numbers/zeta-values as finite harmonic series / correction, Robert Israel
• Funny expression of sum of infinite number of bernoulli-numbers/zeta-values as finite harmonic series, Gottfried Helms
• theorem about submanifolds and maps, Philips
• Pairwise permutation differences, Andy Spragg
• map in Hilbert space, Sauro
• Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, ms
  • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, hagman
    • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, Hero
  • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, Nick
    • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, ms
      • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, Nick
      • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, ms
      • Re: Point of Intersection - Straight line and Curve, Nick
• Definition of exp(x), Leo
  • Re: Definition of exp(x), William Elliot
• The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), donkey
  • Re: The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), G. A. Edgar
  • Re: The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), Dana
  • Re: The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), David W . Cantrell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), Leo
    • Re: The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), Gottfried Helms
    • Re: The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: The Sum (r=1 to n) (1/ r^2), Robert Israel
• commutator subgroup hint, jraul
  • Re: commutator subgroup hint, Derek Holt
    • Re: commutator subgroup hint, Tonico
• Straightforward distance question, Sayaka Fujisaki
  • Re: Straightforward distance question, David Marcus
• Group simple, Paul Hosre
  • Re: Group simple, Mathematician
    • Re: Group simple, Mathematician
    • Re: Group simple, Paul Hosre
      • Re: Group simple, Mathematician
  • Re: Group simple, Arturo Magidin
• Prime-prime, Paul Hosre
  • Re: Prime-prime, Rupert
  • Re: Prime-prime, j . vimal
    • Re: Prime-prime, Rupert
    • Re: Prime-prime, Dave Seaman
• Prime ideals of integral extensions, Jose Capco
  • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Hagen
    • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Jose Capco
      • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Hagen
      • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Jose Capco
      • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Prime ideals of integral extensions, Peter van Rossum
• maximum of a series of iid rand vars, ProbaWannabe
  • Re: maximum of a series of iid rand vars, Mathematician
  • Re: maximum of a series of iid rand vars, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• twin prime clumps ..., Gerard Schildberger
  • Re: twin prime clumps ..., Don Reble
  • Re: twin prime clumps ..., Phil Carmody
• Gap in published article?, Allan Adler
  • Re: Gap in published article?, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Gap in published article?, Allan Adler
      • Re: Gap in published article?, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Gap in published article?, Allan Adler
• unsolved problems, Tim S Roberts
  • Re: unsolved problems, Jason Pawloski
• Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, A Aitken
  • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, MoeBlee
  • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, Jason Pawloski
    • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, Jason Pawloski
  • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, A Aitken
    • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, Russell
  • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, Rupert
    • Re: Least Upper Bound Principle for Q?, A Aitken
• group homomorphism conundrum, Michael Blanc
  • Re: group homomorphism conundrum, Timothy Murphy
• Deformation retraction., Patt
  • Re: Deformation retraction., Zbigniew Karno
  • Re: Deformation retraction., William Elliot
• Graduate Level Math Books For Sale, dgiaimo
  • Re: Graduate Level Math Books For Sale, Nick
  • Re: Graduate Level Math Books For Sale, dgiaimo
• The Perfect Machine, newstips6706
  • Re: The Perfect Machine, David T. Ashley
  • Re: The Perfect Machine, Michael Stemper
  • Re: The Perfect Machine, drmwecker
• Help this person please., RadSurfer
• GuestWorker KICKED_ again disrupting Freenode, RadSurfer
  • Re: GuestWorker KICKED_ again disrupting Freenode, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: GuestWorker KICKED_ again disrupting Freenode, Dave L. Renfro
• heat diffusion integral, rancid moth
  • Re: heat diffusion integral, Robert Israel
  • Re: heat diffusion integral, Paul Abbott
• On inverse of a function from R_n to R_n, Nagu
  • Re: On inverse of a function from R_n to R_n, cbrown
    • Re: On inverse of a function from R_n to R_n, Nagu
• A smooth projective cubic always have 9 flexes, Kira Yamato
  • Re: A smooth projective cubic always have 9 flexes, Kira Yamato
  • Re: A smooth projective cubic always have 9 flexes, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: A smooth projective cubic always have 9 flexes, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: A smooth projective cubic always have 9 flexes, Kira Yamato
• Solving system of matrix equations in Mathcad - Problem, Bbb
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Solving system of matrix equations in Mathcad - problem, Bbb
  • Solving system of matrix equations in Mathcad - problem, Bbb
  • Solving system of matrix equations in Mathcad - problem, Bbb
• Solving system of matrix equations in Mathcad -, Bbb
• Block diagonal matrix from a skew-symmetric matrix, rjfmv
  • Re: Block diagonal matrix from a skew-symmetric matrix, Michael Orion
• Is this a classic math problem? How to solve?, zeb7k
  • Re: Is this a classic math problem? How to solve?, Virgil
• How to calculate the variance?, linglan
  • Re: How to calculate the variance?, Pubkeybreaker
• Unabomber sues U.S. government, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Unabomber sues U.S. government, john . spevacek
  • Re: Unabomber sues U.S. government, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Unabomber sues U.S. government, Lee Rudolph
• Power Set and Collection of finites subsets of N, iAGENT
  • Re: Power Set and Collection of finites subsets of N, Tom Smith
  • Re: Power Set and Collection of finites subsets of N, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Power Set and Collection of finites subsets of N, David C . Ullrich
• How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, nicegirl_130
  • Re: How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, nicegirl_130
      • Re: How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, nicegirl_130
  • Re: How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, David Bernier
    • Re: How to prove the representation of open sets of R as a countable union of disjoint open intervals is unique, nicegirl_130
• Re: Weighted graph partitioning, ivanb
• Fundamental group pi(X) of a Riemann surface is abelian, eugene
  • Re: Fundamental group pi(X) of a Riemann surface is abelian, Zbigniew Karno
    • Re: Fundamental group pi(X) of a Riemann surface is abelian, gmarkowsky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fundamental group pi(X) of a Riemann surface is abelian, eugene
• Does 1/(1+x^2) have a specific name?, hmobahi
  • Re: Does 1/(1+x^2) have a specific name?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Does 1/(1+x^2) have a specific name?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Does 1/(1+x^2) have a specific name?, johnedhudson
  • Re: Does 1/(1+x^2) have a specific name?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 22, 2007, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Is there any such function?, hmobahi
  • Re: Is there any such function?, matt271829-news
    • Re: Is there any such function?, hmobahi
      • Re: Is there any such function?, matt271829-news
      • Re: Is there any such function?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Is there any such function?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Is there any such function?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Is there any such function?, matt271829-news
  • Re: Is there any such function?, Kira Yamato
    • Re: Is there any such function?, hmobahi
  • Re: Is there any such function?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Is there any such function?, matt271829-news
    • Re: Is there any such function?, Robert Israel
  • Re: Is there any such function?, matt271829-news
• Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, joshipura
  • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, William Elliot
    • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, joshipura
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, joshipura
    • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, Hero
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, Hero
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, joshipura
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, Hero
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, joshipura
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, Hero
      • Re: Madhubansi Raas formation and Group theory, joshipura
• simple-connectedness H_1 trivial, T.Foliakis
• Recursive Equations, Michael Knudsen
  • Re: Recursive Equations, kilian heckrodt
• Dot products of unit vectors generated over unit sphere, cauyeung
• Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, irchans
  • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, irchans
      • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, irchans
  • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, Robert Israel
    • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, irchans
  • Re: Complexity Theory Question - Polynomial Time vs. O(n^2) Time, irchans
• Re: Natural-Numbers are equal to the All-Adics; and the geometry they form is pictured; counterexamples to the Riemann Hypothesis, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• This really works! - How to turn $6 into $6000, Andre Papp
• Is ratio of MLEs is still MLE?, linglan
  • Re: Is ratio of MLEs is still MLE?, David Marcus
    • Re: Is ratio of MLEs is still MLE?, linglan
      • Re: Is ratio of MLEs is still MLE?, David Marcus
• System of equations, Blah
  • Re: System of equations, Michael
    • Re: System of equations, Blah
      • Re: System of equations, Robert Israel
  • Re: System of equations, David Marcus
  • Re: System of equations, Robert Israel
• simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, Darren
  • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, David Marcus
    • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, Darren
      • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, Darren
  • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, William Elliot
    • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, David Marcus
      • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, David Marcus
    • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, Darren
      • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: simple question on continuity for map between topological spaces, Darren
• What do you call this?, CodeBlue
  • Re: What do you call this?, William Elliot
• normalizers and centralizers proof check, paul12
  • Re: normalizers and centralizers proof check, Paul Sperry
  • Re: normalizers and centralizers proof check, Tonico
  • Re: normalizers and centralizers proof check, Arturo Magidin
• cosets, paul12
  • Re: cosets, Paul Sperry
  • Re: cosets, Arturo Magidin
• convergence in probability of a var, ProbaWannabe
  • Re: convergence in probability of a var, quebecstat
  • Re: convergence in probability of a var, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Characterizing Real Number Set, Kobu
  • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, David Marcus
      • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, William Elliot
      • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, William Elliot
      • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, Kobu
  • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, William Elliot
  • Re: Characterizing Real Number Set, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• GuestWorker disrupting IRC, RadSurfer
  • Re: GuestWorker disrupting IRC, David Marcus
  • Re: GuestWorker disrupting IRC, Wayne Brown
  • Re: GuestWorker disrupting IRC, Dave L. Renfro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • GuestWorker disrupting IRC, RadSurfer
    • Re: GuestWorker disrupting IRC, Wayne Brown
• finite differences, xarnaudx@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: finite differences, xarnaudx@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: finite differences, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: finite differences, xarnaudx@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: finite differences, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: finite differences, xarnaudx@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: finite differences, David C . Ullrich
  • Message not available
    • Re: finite differences, Rob Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: finite differences, Rob Johnson
• Checking a martingale, Christoph Bartoschek
  • Re: Checking a martingale, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Checking a martingale, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Checking a martingale, Christoph Bartoschek
      • Message not available
      • Re: Checking a martingale, Christoph Bartoschek
  • Re: Checking a martingale, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• New IRC Channel: #moderncalcs, RadSurfer
• riemann-stieltjes ?, vsgdp
  • Re: riemann-stieltjes ?, Arturo Magidin
• range of a function (image of domain under function), i . love . jeevitha
  • Re: range of a function (image of domain under function), Arturo Magidin
• Percentage of permutations with the longest cycle at most x, Dan Dima
  • Re: Percentage of permutations with the longest cycle at most x, James Waldby
• Galois Fields help, El-Mehdi Taileb
  • Re: Galois Fields help, El-Mehdi Taileb
• No polynomial map can have a Herman ring, eugene
  • Re: No polynomial map can have a Herman ring, jane
• Trigonometric equations, León-Sotelo
  • Re: Trigonometric equations, Sha Jianwen
  • Re: Trigonometric equations, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Trigonometric equations, kilian heckrodt
    • Re: Trigonometric equations, pepavidosa
      • Re: Trigonometric equations, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Trigonometric equations, kilian heckrodt
• Re: India's scientific tradition ?, kilian heckrodt
• Homomorphism & solvable groups., bluelabel
  • Re: Homomorphism & solvable groups., bluelabel
  • Re: Homomorphism & solvable groups., Tonico
  • Re: Homomorphism & solvable groups., Bill Hale
• a simple(?) probability question..., ertug
  • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., er2
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Andrew Holme
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
    • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., er2
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Faton Berisha
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., James Waldby
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., James Waldby
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Randy Poe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., Joe
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
      • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., matt271829-news
  • Re: a simple(?) probability question..., bill
• Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Jan
  • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Amadeus Polonium-210
    • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Amadeus Polonium-210
  • Message not available
    • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, David W . Cantrell
      • Message not available
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Jan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Jan
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Jan
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Jan
      • Re: Geometry: area optimized arrangement of rectangles, Jan
• What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., pacman18_2008
  • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Helmut Richter
    • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., William Elliot
    • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Nick
  • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Alfred Flaßhaar
    • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Gerry Myerson
    • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Nick
      • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Virgil
      • Re: What is the general formula for the series 1, 2, 4, 7, 11, ........., Nick
• A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, Proginoskes
  • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, Proginoskes
    • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, William Elliot
      • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, a_plutonium
      • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, Proginoskes
      • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, Larry Lard
      • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, Tonico
      • Message not available
      • Re: misbehaviour on the Internet and you can lose your teaching license Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, Amadeus Polonium-210
  • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, David Parker
  • Re: A Proposal for Archimedes Plutonium to Consider, David T. Ashley
• trigonometric system / orthonormal basis in L^2, quebecstat
  • Re: trigonometric system / orthonormal basis in L^2, Alfred Flaßhaar
• Moving logic quantifiers past statements, lite . on . beta
  • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, David Marcus
    • Message not available
      • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, G . Frege
  • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, lite . on . beta
      • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, G . Frege
  • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, G . Frege
    • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, G . Frege
      • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, David Marcus
  • Re: Moving logic quantifiers past statements, Bill Hale
• Should we worry about contradictions?, Robert Kaufman
  • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, Tonico
  • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, David Marcus
    • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, aatu . koskensilta
      • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, David Marcus
  • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, aatu . koskensilta
      • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, aatu . koskensilta
      • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, Gc
      • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, aatu . koskensilta
  • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, G . Frege
  • Re: Should we worry about contradictions?, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• The Art of Counting TIME, newstips6706
• A riddle in analysis, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: A riddle in analysis, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: A riddle in analysis, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: A riddle in analysis, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: A riddle in analysis, Robert Sheskey
      • Re: A riddle in analysis, ram.rachum@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A riddle in analysis, Robert Israel
    • Re: A riddle in analysis, David Ames
• Inexact differentials, Rudy von Massow
  • Re: Inexact differentials, Daniel Mayost
• Re: #5# book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics...."; chapter (4) proving Riemann Hypothesis, David Winsemius
  • Re: #5# book "Correcting Present Day Mathematics...."; chapter (4) proving Riemann Hypothesis, The Ghost In The Machine
• Quadratic Sieve's implementation, federico
  • Re: Quadratic Sieve's implementation, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Quadratic Sieve's implementation, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Quadratic Sieve's implementation, Christian Siebert
• Analysis of the Stiffness Matrix, FEM, honhaar . goonda
• group proof hint needed, paul12
  • Re: group proof hint needed, Bill Hale
  • Re: group proof hint needed, Daniel Mayost
• Prime, hayk
  • Re: Prime, lugita15
  • Re: Prime, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Prime, Klueless
    • Re: Prime, hayk
• Question on Integer solutions, Deep
• Re: finite rank operator, Philips
• Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Tom Smith
    • Message not available
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Tom Smith
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Tom Smith
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, David Marcus
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, David Marcus
  • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Is probability over rational numbers zero in uniform distribution?, The Cool Giraffe
• Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, did
  • Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, bubu
    • Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, did
      • Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, bubu
      • Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, david petry
      • Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, bubu
      • Re: fourier transform of bump function or schwartz function, did
• what algorithm to use for this task?, smekla
  • Message not available
    • Re: what algorithm to use for this task?, smekla
      • Re: what algorithm to use for this task?, smekla
  • Re: what algorithm to use for this task?, Randy Poe
    • Re: what algorithm to use for this task?, smekla
• Help me with an equation, Zeratul
  • Re: Help me with an equation, Mathematician
  • Re: Help me with an equation, Roman B. Binder
  • Re: Help me with an equation, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Help me with an equation, Mathematician
• Previous 1/20 Post - Ignore - Error, Leonard M. Wapner
• Uncountable subsets of omega_1, William Elliot
  • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, William Elliot
    • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, William Elliot
  • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, Rupert
    • Re: Uncountable subsets of omega_1, William Elliot
• Images??, bluelabel
  • Re: Images??, hagman
• logarithmic scale starting with 0, different
  • Re: logarithmic scale starting with 0, different
  • Re: logarithmic scale starting with 0, hagman
  • Re: logarithmic scale starting with 0, matt271829-news
    • Re: logarithmic scale starting with 0, different
      • Re: logarithmic scale starting with 0, matt271829-news
• Re: Seeking efficient sequential-Carmichael-number generator, Gottfried Helms
• Surface,which is not second countable, eugene
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Surface,which is not second countable, eugene
    • Re: Surface,which is not second countable, eugene
      • Re: Surface,which is not second countable, hagman
      • Re: Surface,which is not second countable, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Surface,which is not second countable, A N Niel
• Bivariate Spline interpolation on non-grid data, Binesh Bannerjee
  • Re: Bivariate Spline interpolation on non-grid data, Jentje Goslinga
    • Re: Bivariate Spline interpolation on non-grid data, Binesh Bannerjee
• I have a question about classical isoperimetric inequalities.please help me.Thanks., Kaz
  • Re: I have a question about classical isoperimetric inequalities.please help me.Thanks., Badger
• Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
  • Re: Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?, hagman
    • Re: Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
      • Re: Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?-, JEMebius
  • Re: Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Q1*Q2*Q3*........*Qn is called ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
• The transcription problem, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: The transcription problem, cbrown
• A073833: Lim n -> Inf, Zak Seidov
  • Re: A073833: Lim n -> Inf, Gerry Myerson
• F(x,y,y')=0, ib
  • Re: F(x,y,y')=0, Gib Bogle
  • Re: F(x,y,y')=0-, JEMebius
    • Re: F(x,y,y')=0-, ib
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • F(x,y,y')=0, ib
    • Re: F(x,y,y')=0, karl
• help on graph algorithms - constructing a tree with a mixed criterion, Yecloud
  • Re: help on graph algorithms - constructing a tree with a mixed criterion, Yecloud
• Exponential form, Thom Jameson
  • Re: Exponential form, Virgil
• help to solve a recurrence equation, noble_c
  • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, matt271829-news
    • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Zak Seidov
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, noble_c
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, James Waldby
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Zak Seidov
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Paul Abbott
  • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Rainer Rosenthal
    • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, Paul Abbott
  • Re: help to solve a recurrence equation, noble_c
• Challenge for 60sec!!, Anton11
• subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Toope
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Toope
    • Message not available
      • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Robert Israel
    • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Robert Israel
  • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Toope
  • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Toope
    • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Tim Peters
      • Re: subset sum problem - kind of - is there a solution?, Toope
• Question on duplicating the cube with compass and ruler, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Question on duplicating the cube with compass and ruler, bluelabel
    • Re: Question on duplicating the cube with compass and ruler, Arturo Magidin
• Axiomatic theory for a hierarchy of collections, 2Pac
  • Re: Axiomatic theory for a hierarchy of collections, G . Frege
• noury goujjane, mail656859
• Spectral Radius question, Tom Smith
  • Re: Spectral Radius question, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Spectral Radius question, Tom Smith
      • Re: Spectral Radius question, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Spectral Radius question, Tom Smith
      • Re: Spectral Radius question, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Spectral Radius question, David C . Ullrich
• Convolution of operator product, Gernot Pfanner
• Functions with compact supports, gherardi3
  • Re: Functions with compact supports, David Marcus
• Special nature of e and pi?, Keta
  • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, David T. Ashley
  • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, user923005
  • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, ryan
    • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, bwray314
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, bwray314
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, njs220
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, bwray314
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Gib Bogle
    • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Thomas Wasell
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Michael Press
    • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, danielmryan
  • Re: Special nature of e and pi?, Zbigniew Karno
• Plus-Minus Notation, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Plus-Minus Notation, Amadeus Polonium-210
  • Re: Plus-Minus Notation, William Elliot
• Photographic savant, Ioannis
• normalizer, paul12
  • Re: normalizer, hagman
  • Re: normalizer, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: normalizer, Derek Holt
• Combinatorial question, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Combinatorial question, hagman
    • Re: Combinatorial question, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Combinatorial question, david petry
  • Message not available
    • Re: Combinatorial question, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Combinatorial question, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Combinatorial question, Thomas Mautsch
  • Re: Combinatorial question, Robert Israel
    • Re: Combinatorial question, Thomas Mautsch
• funny story about the JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, Oleg
  • Re: funny story about the JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: funny story about the JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: funny story about the JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: funny story about the JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: funny story about the JOURNAL OF DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY, Oleg
• algebra with normal extension., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with normal extension., hagman
    • Re: algebra with normal extension., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with normal extension., hagman
      • Re: algebra with normal extension., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with normal extension., hagman
• A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, nicegirl_130
  • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, Michael Press
      • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, Michael Press
  • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, nicegirl_130
  • Re: A help with a formal proof for an "obvious" fact, please, Randy Poe
• logarithmic interpolation beginning on interval beginning with 0 value, different
  • Re: logarithmic interpolation beginning on interval beginning with 0 value, Zbigniew Karno
    • Re: logarithmic interpolation beginning on interval beginning with 0 value, Zbigniew Karno
• preliminary topological lemma, Philips
  • Re: preliminary topological lemma, William Elliot
  • Re: preliminary topological lemma, Zbigniew Karno
• C* algebra problem 2.12.13 Dixmier, Nimo123
• I have seen the sun, sc
  • Re: I have seen the sun, The Ghost In The Machine
• Problems regarding on Contxt-Free Grammars, pacman18_2008
• group problem, paul12
  • Re: group problem, hagman
  • Re: group problem, Amateur
    • Re: group problem, paul12
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: group problem, paul12
    • Re: group problem, Arturo Magidin
• division optimization, haoc
  • Re: division optimization, Chip Eastham
    • Re: division optimization, haoc
      • Re: division optimization, Chip Eastham
      • Re: division optimization, haoc
      • Re: division optimization, Chip Eastham
• Re: JSH: Just a basic screw-up, Rupert
  • Re: JSH: Just a basic screw-up, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: Just a basic screw-up, marcus_b
  • Re: JSH: Just a basic screw-up, Jesse F. Hughes
• Symmetry And Conservation, symphony
• prolem on metric space, tango
  • Re: prolem on metric space, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: prolem on metric space, Robert Israel
    • Re: prolem on metric space, michaeld
  • Re: prolem on metric space, Oleg
    • Re: prolem on metric space, Ronald Bruck
• Logarithmic convolution, any inverse solutions?, KE
• Linear group over a finite field, Jean Pierre MERX
  • Re: Linear group over a finite field, Derek Holt
    • Re: Linear group over a finite field, cody . roux
      • Re: Linear group over a finite field, Timothy Murphy
• Can anyone simplify this?, matt271829-news
• Re: New model for primality test, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New model for primality test, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: New model for primality test, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Need source for math posters and such?, me
  • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, me
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, The World Wide Wade
      • Message not available
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Bob A
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, James Dolan
  • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, David T. Ashley
    • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, me
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, David T. Ashley
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, me
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Bob A
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Bob A
    • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, James Dolan
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, James Dolan
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Russell
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, James Dolan
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Russell
  • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Bob A
  • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, rip pelletier
    • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, me
    • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, me
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, rip pelletier
      • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, me
  • Re: Need source for math posters and such?, Michael Jørgensen
• OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David T. Ashley
  • OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, galathaea
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, cbrown
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, hagman
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Butch Malahide
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David T. Ashley
      • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, cbrown
    • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Chip Eastham
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David Bernier
    • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Phil Carmody
      • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David Bernier
      • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Phil Carmody
  • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Michael Stemper
    • Re: OT: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, A N Niel
  • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David T. Ashley
    • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Chip Eastham
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David T. Ashley
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David T. Ashley
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Chip Eastham
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David T. Ashley
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, cbrown
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, David Bernier
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Phil Carmody
      • Re: I Need a Fashionable Newsgroup Name, Michael Press
• Arabic numerals; also logarithms, oneuse706055475659
  • Re: Arabic numerals; also logarithms, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Arabic numerals; also logarithms, hagman
  • Re: Arabic numerals; also logarithms-, JEMebius
• I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, nicegirl_130
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Chip Eastham
  • I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, galathaea
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Ken Pledger
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, cbrown
      • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Larry Lard
    • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, me
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, cbrown
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, nicegirl_130
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Dana
    • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, me
    • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, me
      • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, Dana
  • Re: I'd like suggestions on how to improve my math, ivandmeir
• How to convert a Geometer's Sketchpad drawing into bitmap?, Tim Walters
  • Re: How to convert a Geometer's Sketchpad drawing into bitmap?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: How to convert a Geometer's Sketchpad drawing into bitmap?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: How to convert a Geometer's Sketchpad drawing into bitmap?, Dirk Van de moortel
• What is the equation of a give points set in R^3 ., Thor . Raymond
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is the equation of a give points set in R^3 -, JEMebius
• Nonconstructive metaproofs, Jason Orendorff
  • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, Jason Orendorff
      • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, LauLuna
      • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, Jason Orendorff
      • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, LauLuna
      • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, Jason Orendorff
  • Re: Nonconstructive metaproofs, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Just a basic screw-up, Festive Intestinal Gasses
• mitchell vanbeekum mitch vanbeekum ozzyhead.com van beekum ozzyhead. mitch vanbeekum mitchell vanbeekum ozzyhead.com van beekum ozzyhead, Ozzyhead
  • Re: mitchell vanbeekum mitch vanbeekum ozzyhead.com van beekum ozzyhead. mitch vanbeekum mitchell vanbeekum ozzyhead.com van beekum ozzyhead, josillo_xuleito
• Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, hagman
    • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, hagman
  • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
    • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, MoeBlee
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
      • Re: Axiom of Pairing, Scheme of Replacement from others, G . Frege
• proper+compact, Philips
  • Re: proper+compact, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: proper+compact, Philips
      • Re: proper+compact, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: proper+compact, Philips
      • Re: proper+compact, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: proper+compact, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: proper+compact, Philips
• Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Nick
  • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic-, JEMebius
  • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, David T. Ashley
  • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Nick
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Nick
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, David Marcus
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, galathaea
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Nick
      • Re: Fundamental Theorem of Arithmetic, Chip Eastham
• algebra with basis., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with basis., hagman
    • Re: algebra with basis., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with basis., hagman
• motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, HopfZ
  • Re: motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, hagman
    • Re: motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, Herman Rubin
  • Re: motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, Lars Olsen
  • Re: motivation for definition of Lebesgue-measurable set, Jason Orendorff
• Strange shape- what is math behind it?, ivars . fabriciuss
  • Re: Strange shape- what is math behind it?, matt271829-news
  • Re: Strange shape- what is math behind it?, Hero
    • Re: Strange shape- what is math behind it?, ivars . fabriciuss
      • Re: Strange shape- what is math behind it?, ivars . fabriciuss
      • Re: Strange shape- what is math behind it?, Akira Bergman
      • Re: Strange shape- what is math behind it?, ivars . fabriciuss
• No quasiconformal mappin from D onto C, eugene
  • Re: No quasiconformal mappin from D onto C, gmarkowsky
• Borel sets, The Cool Giraffe
  • Re: Borel sets, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Borel sets, mathman
    • Re: Borel sets, Dave L. Renfro
• limit and accumulation points, Philips
  • Re: limit and accumulation points, William Elliot
    • Re: limit and accumulation points, William Elliot
      • Re: limit and accumulation points, Philips
      • Re: limit and accumulation points, William Elliot
• Re: A question about Probable Primes, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A question about Probable Primes, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: A question about Probable Primes / cpu speed, James Waldby
      • Re: A question about Probable Primes / cpu speed, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: A question about Probable Primes, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Need help with a complex division, Leigh
  • Re: Need help with a complex division, hagman
  • Re: Need help with a complex division, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: Need help with a complex division, Ken Pledger
• closed form of summation of factorial, suchok
  • Re: closed form of summation of factorial, Proginoskes
  • Re: closed form of summation of factorial, hagman
  • Re: closed form of summation of factorial, David W . Cantrell
• Re: Jai Maharaj terrorizes the sci.lang newsgroup, Red
  • Re: Jai Maharaj terrorizes the sci.lang newsgroup, fishfry
• Taxicab norm, bluelabel
  • Re: Taxicab norm, hagman
    • Re: Taxicab norm-, JEMebius
• Vote for Your Favorite Math T-Shirt - For a Good Cause, Josh
• Golden Ratio Engel Expansion, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion, Gerry Myerson
      • God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), Doh
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: God lives in numbers (was: Re: Golden Ratio Engel Expansion), jay1bala@xxxxxxx
• Putnam exam problems, Mark-T
  • Re: Putnam exam problems, Peter L. Montgomery
• Substitution in limits, i . love . jeevitha
  • Re: Substitution in limits, William Elliot
    • Re: Substitution in limits, i . love . jeevitha
      • Re: Substitution in limits, William Elliot
• JSH: Rethinking My Approch, jstevh@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Rethinking My Approch, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: Rethinking My Approch, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: Rethinking My Approch, Jon Slaughter
• 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers, newstips6706
  • Re: 1, 2, 3, 5, 7... PRIME Numbers, William Elliot
• Group Table, Tom
  • Re: Group Table, cbrown
  • Re: Group Table, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Group Table, Brian Molnar
  • Re: Group Table, Tom
• Re: Combinatorial optimization question, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Sorry, fixed typo mistakes, fishfry
• Placing Pieces Along a Line Of Dots: Game, Leroy Quet
• Easier(?) Recursion Puzzle, Leroy Quet
• Picard's theorem for z^nsin1/z, graumet
  • Re: Picard's theorem for z^nsin1/z, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Picard's theorem for z^nsin1/z, graumet
• Fast Fourier Filtering?, eclectic . sounds
  • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, Brian Molnar
    • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, eclectic . sounds
      • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, eclectic . sounds
      • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, Brian Molnar
      • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, eclectic . sounds
  • Re: Fast Fourier Filtering?, eclectic . sounds
• SVD + principal vector, kfragkos
• Re: Sets as mathematical objects, Wesley Morris
  • Re: Sets as mathematical objects, Fuckwit
  • Re: Sets as mathematical objects, David Marcus
  • Re: Sets as mathematical objects, Michael Stemper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Sets as mathematical objects, Gerry Myerson
• Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
  • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
      • Re: Base-b digits of primes and their reciprocals, r.e.s.
• A problem about Metric space, tango
  • Re: A problem about Metric space, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: A problem about Metric space, tango
  • Re: A problem about Metric space, tango
    • Re: A problem about Metric space, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: A problem about Metric space, hagman
  • Re: A problem about Metric space, Herman Rubin
• Re: Basic Set Theory Question (I'm very sorry. I have cancelled other articles, because more typo error), hagman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Basic Set Theory Question (I'm very sorry. I have cancelled other articles, because more typo error), hagman
  • Re: Basic Set Theory Question (I'm very sorry. I have cancelled other articles, because more typo error), MoeBlee
    • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, MoeBlee
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, MoeBlee
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, Virgil
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, MoeBlee
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, G . Frege
      • Message not available
      • Re: Basic Set Theory Question, MoeBlee
• seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial, simpson_alan
  • Re: seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial, hagman
  • Re: seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial, Gerry Myerson
    • upper bounds for Stirling numbers of the first kind. Was: seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial, simpson_alan
      • Re: upper bounds for Stirling numbers of the first kind. Was: seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: upper bounds for Stirling numbers of the first kind. Was: seeking bounds on size of coefficients of these polynomial, Temp
• Lets build the highest tower in the world in your country?, alex
• Eighteen months, fernando revilla
  • Re: Eighteen months, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
  • Re: Eighteen months, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Re: Eighteen months, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Re: Eighteen months, David Marcus
      • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Re: Eighteen months, David Marcus
      • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Re: Eighteen months, fjmd1a
      • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Eighteen months, galathaea
    • Re: Eighteen months, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
    • Re: Eighteen months, T.H. Ray
  • Eighteen months, galathaea
    • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
      • Re: Eighteen months, galathaea
    • Re: Eighteen months, fernando revilla
• Graphs of functions and their derivatives, Charles Wells
• bounded variation2, jraul
• number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
  • Re: number with Fibonacci..', hagman
    • Re: number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
  • Re: number with Fibonacci..', Robert Israel
    • Re: number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', Robert Israel
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', Robert Israel
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', Robert Israel
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', Robert Israel
      • Re: number with Fibonacci..', mina_world
• interesting optimization problem, Nhat
  • Re: interesting optimization problem, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: interesting optimization problem, Nhat
• Axiomatic Set Theory: Hilbert II mongaga, m31
  • Re: Axiomatic Set Theory: Hilbert II mongaga, Allan Adler
    • Re: Axiomatic Set Theory: Hilbert II mongaga, m31
• all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0?, deccard
  • Re: all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0?, kilian heckrodt
      • Re: all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0?, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0?, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0? -, JEMebius
  • Re: all solutions of sin(pi*z)=0?, kilian heckrodt
• algebra with splitting field and automorphism., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with splitting field and automorphism., hagman
    • Re: algebra with splitting field and automorphism., mina_world
• problem in real analysis, mohsen
  • Re: problem in real analysis, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: problem in real analysis, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: problem in real analysis, David C . Ullrich
• Homology, Fedor
  • Re: Homology, Oleg
    • Re: Homology, Fedor
      • Re: Homology, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Homology, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Homology, Lee Rudolph
• Topological conjugaction example, eugene
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Topological conjugaction example, eugene
    • Re: Topological conjugaction example, Robert Israel
      • Re: Topological conjugaction example, eugene
• Baer Rings, Jose Capco
  • Re: Baer Rings, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Baer Rings, Jose Capco
• Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Philips
  • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Philips
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, pauldepstein
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Carsten Schultz
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Philips
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Philips
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Philips
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Bolzano Weierstrass for topological spaces, Oleg
• 2nd Regional Conference on Ecological and Environmental Modelling, vravi68@xxxxxxxxx
• Diagnosing apparent prime is composite? (was: Generating Carmichael number), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• Best prime-proof methods? (was: Generating Carmichael number), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Best prime-proof methods? (was: Generating Carmichael number), Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Best prime-proof methods? (was: Generating Carmichael number), Phil Carmody
    • Re: Best prime-proof methods? (was: Generating Carmichael number), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Best prime-proof methods?, mm
      • Re: Best prime-proof methods? (was: Generating Carmichael number), Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Best prime-proof methods? (was: Generating Carmichael number), Michael Press
• Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, Rupert
  • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, David Bernier
      • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, Herman Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: field generated by Cantor-like set of reals, Dave L. Renfro
• Re: EVOLUTION OF MATHEMATICS, Red
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: EVOLUTION OF MATHEMATICS, Red
• Help w/calculus problem, Dean_Travers
  • Re: Help w/calculus problem, G Patel
    • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Russell
      • Re: Help w/calculus problem, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Russell
  • Re: Help w/calculus problem, matt271829-news
    • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Russell
      • Re: Help w/calculus problem, matt271829-news
      • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Russell
    • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Russell
  • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Narasimham
    • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Russell
    • Re: Help w/calculus problem, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Narasimham
    • Re: Help w/calculus problem, Narasimham
• Carmichael numbers are easy to factor! (was: Generating Carmichael number), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
• The Number '1', newstips6706
• -2cos(x) - sin(x) simplification?, crocostimpy
  • Re: -2cos(x) - sin(x) simplification?, Robert Israel
  • Re: -2cos(x) - sin(x) simplification?, matt271829-news
    • Re: -2cos(x) - sin(x) simplification?, crocostimpy
  • Re: -2cos(x) - sin(x) simplification?, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Solution for a question, mehmetakifaltundal
  • Message not available
    • Re: Solution for a question, matt271829-news
• Delaunay Triangulation - Spline Interpolation, Binesh Bannerjee
  • Re: Delaunay Triangulation - Spline Interpolation, Chris Smith
• Can this summation be simplified?, crosstalk
  • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, crosstalk
  • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, Daniel Mayost
    • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, Robert Israel
      • Message not available
      • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, kilian heckrodt
      • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, kilian heckrodt
    • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, Michael
  • Message not available
    • Re: Can this summation be simplified?, Rob Johnson
• (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Robert Israel
  • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Daniel Mayost
  • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Robert Israel
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: (Functional Analysis) Please help me understand this proof, Gonçalo Rodrigues
• Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Kenneth Bull
  • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, amzoti
  • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, abe . buckingham
    • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Robert Israel
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Kenneth Bull
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, matt271829-news
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, matt271829-news
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Virgil
    • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, toni . lassila
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, David Ames
  • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, junoexpress
    • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Kenneth Bull
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Kenneth Bull
    • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Tonico
    • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Tom Smith
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Robert Israel
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, secondmouse
      • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, Jason Pawloski
    • Re: Lucky me, I get to buy Rudin, ma_khan1981
• Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, hagman
    • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, David Marcus
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, David Marcus
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, David Marcus
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, David Marcus
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, Michael Stemper
      • Re: Countable basis implies separability?, David Marcus
• Prime decay - Some comments would be nice, zacariaz
  • Re: Prime decay - Some comments would be nice, jankrihau
  • Re: Prime decay - Some comments would be nice, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Prime decay - Some comments would be nice, Tim Peters
    • Re: Prime decay - Some comments would be nice, zacariaz
• Group Theory question, Anolethron
  • Re: Group Theory question, Tonico
    • Re: Group Theory question, Anolethron
      • Re: Group Theory question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Group Theory question, Anolethron
      • Re: Group Theory question, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Group Theory question, Anolethron
      • Re: Group Theory question, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Group Theory question, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Group Theory question, Anolethron
    • Re: Group Theory question, Anolethron
      • Re: Group Theory question, Arturo Magidin
• Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil
      • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein
      • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, David Marcus
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Virgil
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Do reals really have to be genuine numbers?, marian
• proper closed, Philips
  • Re: proper closed, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: proper closed, Philips
      • Re: proper closed, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: proper closed, Philips
      • [] proper closed, William Elliot
      • Re: [] proper closed, Philips
      • Re: [] proper closed, William Elliot
      • Re: [] proper closed, David C . Ullrich
• Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein
  • Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Countability of real numbers, Eckard Blumschein
    • Re: Countability of real numbers, David Marcus
    • Re: Countability of real numbers, Virgil
• Condition for Integer Value, Deep
  • Re: Condition for Integer Value, Pubkeybreaker
• algebra with splitting field., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with splitting field., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: algebra with splitting field., Arturo Magidin
  • Re: algebra with splitting field., hagman
• Re: number with (-1)^0 = ?, Pubkeybreaker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: number with (-1)^0 = ?, Kaba
    • Re: number with (-1)^0 = ?, David W . Cantrell
• Mod 2011, León-Sotelo
  • Re: Mod 2011, Giovanni Resta
  • Re: Mod 2011, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Mod 2011, Nick
      • Re: Mod 2011, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: Mod 2011, Erick Bryce Wong
      • Re: Mod 2011, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Mod 2011, Erick Bryce Wong
      • Re: Mod 2011, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Mod 2011, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Mod 2011, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Mod 2011, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Mod 2011, León-Sotelo
    • Re: Mod 2011, Nick
  • Re: Mod 2011, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Mod 2011, William Elliot
  • Re: Mod 2011, Robert Israel
    • Re: Mod 2011, Zak Seidov
• Number of elliptic curves over finite fields, Rolf Bardeli
  • Re: Number of elliptic curves over finite fields, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Number of elliptic curves over finite fields, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: Number of elliptic curves over finite fields, Rolf Bardeli
      • Re: Number of elliptic curves over finite fields, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Number of elliptic curves over finite fields, Jyrki Lahtonen
• Re: trig identity, joek_15
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: trig identity, K S
• Re: New Proof, Festive Intestinal Gasses
• The Rewards of Honesty? in Korea, vanilla sky
  • Re: The Rewards of Honesty? in Korea, William Elliot
  • Re: The Rewards of Honesty? in Korea, Allan Adler
• minimal changed digits the product of a a string of numbers to equal another, Alexander Higgins
  • Re: minimal changed digits the product of a a string of numbers to equal another, William Elliot
    • Re: minimal changed digits the product of a a string of numbers to equal another, hagman
  • Re: minimal changed digits the product of a a string of numbers to equal another, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Finding x for the equation tan^2x, AB
  • Re: Finding x for the equation tan^2x, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Finding x for the equation tan^2x, AB
      • Re: Finding x for the equation tan^2x, AB
      • Re: Finding x for the equation tan^2x, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Finding x for the equation tan^2x, Rick Decker
• Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jay1bala
  • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Rick Decker
    • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Randy Poe
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, David Marcus
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Nick
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jaapsch
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Randy Poe
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, A N Niel
  • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Festive Intestinal Gasses
  • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Nick
    • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, A N Niel
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, Temp
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, jay1bala@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Proof that circle is a subset of a rectangle, David Marcus
• Permutations, DataM
  • Re: Permutations, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Permutations, Michael
  • Re: Permutations, James Waldby
• What formula applies to this?, Matt S
  • Re: What formula applies to this?, Proginoskes
    • Re: What formula applies to this?, matt271829-news
  • Re: What formula applies to this?, matt271829-news
  • Re: What formula applies to this?, James Waldby
    • Re: What formula applies to this?, James Waldby
• Nomenclature history: metric (tensor)?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: Nomenclature history: metric (tensor)?, Dave L. Renfro
• Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, Derek Holt
    • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, Allan Adler
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, Allan Adler
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, Derek Holt
      • Re: Character Tables for M24 and M12, PaulHjelmstad
• Optimisation, stephaneo
  • Re: Optimisation, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Optimisation, stephaneo
• Modulus problem, zacariaz
  • Re: Modulus problem, Robert Israel
  • Re: Modulus problem, fishfry
    • Re: Modulus problem, zacariaz
      • Re: Modulus problem, Jyrki Lahtonen
  • Re: Modulus problem, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Modulus problem, zacariaz
      • Re: Modulus problem, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Modulus problem, zacariaz
      • Re: Modulus problem, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: Modulus problem, zacariaz
• complex plane integral, deccard
  • Re: complex plane integral, Robert Israel
• ELEMENTARY REFERENCES FOR MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: ELEMENTARY REFERENCES FOR MATHEMATICAL INDUCTION, Dave L. Renfro
• continuity f+g, paul12
  • Re: continuity f+g, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: continuity f+g, Ioannis
    • Re: continuity f+g, Ioannis
  • Re: continuity f+g, Ronald Bruck
• Re: Proof of x0=0 - N Biggs, Learner
  • Re: Proof of x0=0 - N Biggs, David Marcus
  • Re: Proof of x0=0 - N Biggs, Saurav
    • Re: Proof of x0=0 - N Biggs, David Marcus
      • Re: Proof of x0=0 - N Biggs, Learner
• ask about infinite dimensional theory, Philips
  • Re: ask about infinite dimensional theory, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: ask about infinite dimensional theory, Philips
      • Re: ask about infinite dimensional theory, Mate
• Help! What is the best way to find circular symmetry in a square matrix?, Robert A. Macy
• Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, AB
  • Re: Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, AB
      • Re: Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, AB
      • Re: Calc - Mean value theorem for integrals, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Online expression calculator, webmaster
• checking relation between two parameter, ma
  • Re: checking relation between two parameter, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• kfgauss23: Infinitely many Ramsey numbers, yes or no?, kfgauss23
  • Re: kfgauss23: Infinitely many Ramsey numbers, yes or no?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: kfgauss23: Infinitely many Ramsey numbers, yes or no?, Proginoskes
  • Re: kfgauss23: Infinitely many Ramsey numbers, yes or no?, Zbigniew Karno
  • Re: kfgauss23: Infinitely many Ramsey numbers, yes or no?, Erick Bryce Wong
    • Re: kfgauss23: Infinitely many Ramsey numbers, yes or no?, Butch Malahide
• Finitistic proof, tango
  • Re: Finitistic proof, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Finitistic proof, aatu . koskensilta
    • Re: Finitistic proof, tango
      • Re: Finitistic proof, aatu . koskensilta
    • Re: Finitistic proof, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Finitistic proof, aatu . koskensilta
• Re: Graph Theory, Jose Capco
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Graph Theory, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: Graph Theory, Marc Olschok
    • Re: Graph Theory, Jose Capco
      • Re: Graph Theory, Marc Olschok
      • Re: Graph Theory, Proginoskes
• Silly numeric hack, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Silly numeric hack, hagman
    • Re: Silly numeric hack, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Silly numeric hack, giovanni resta
• Simple boundary point, eugene
  • Re: Simple boundary point, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Simple boundary point, eugene
• Gre subject test study group?, boanerges35
  • Re: Gre subject test study group?, dbbarua
• Largest Twin Primes Found, pacionet
  • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, N. Silver
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Richard Henry
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Proginoskes
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, user923005
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, user923005
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, dmlpat
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, amzoti
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, N. Silver
      • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, dmlpat
    • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Prai Jei
  • Re: Largest Twin Primes Found, Zak Seidov
• Straightforward Five Lemma question, Tom Smith
  • Re: Straightforward Five Lemma question, hagman
    • Re: Straightforward Five Lemma question, Tom Smith
• sum of intersection of ideals, Jose Capco
• p-Laplacian / regularity, don
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, January 15, 2007, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Differential equation problem, jamesk156
  • Re: Differential equation problem, Michael Jørgensen
  • Re: Differential equation problem, Oleg
    • Re: Differential equation problem, jamesk156
  • Re: Differential equation problem, Oleg
• Re: JSH: New Proof, Rupert
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: New Proof, jankrihau
    • Re: JSH: New Proof, Larry Lard
      • Re: JSH: New Proof, David Bernier
      • Re: JSH: New Proof, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: New Proof, David Bernier
  • Re: JSH: New Proof, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: JSH: New Proof, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: New Proof, fishfry
• 2007^2007's rubbish, Zak Seidov
  • Re: 2007^2007's rubbish, Zak Seidov
    • Re: 2007^2007's rubbish, Proginoskes
• set theory with denumerable., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with denumerable., Rupert
    • Re: set theory with denumerable., hagman
      • Re: set theory with denumerable., Rupert
      • Re: set theory with denumerable., hagman
      • Re: set theory with denumerable., Dave Seaman
      • Re: set theory with denumerable., Carsten Schultz
    • Re: set theory with denumerable., mina_world
    • Re: set theory with denumerable., Butch Malahide
  • Re: set theory with denumerable., fishfry
• how to prove a uniformly converge problem, fei . w . steven
  • Re: how to prove a uniformly converge problem, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: how to prove a uniformly converge problem, fei . w . steven
      • Re: how to prove a uniformly converge problem, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: how to prove a uniformly converge problem, Faton Berisha
      • Re: how to prove a uniformly converge problem, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: how to prove a uniformly converge problem, Oleg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • how to prove a uniformly converge problem, fei . w . steven
• arclength2, jraul
  • Re: arclength2, Daniel Mayost
• variation on euler's infinite product expansion, tachyon
  • Re: variation on euler's infinite product expansion, Robert Israel
    • Re: variation on euler's infinite product expansion, tachyon
  • Re: variation on euler's infinite product expansion, Paul Abbott
• Re: ambiguous names?, Gerry Myerson
• Quick Question on Maple, micmicmic2000
  • Re: Quick Question on Maple, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Quick Question on Maple, Raqeeb Rasheed
      • Re: Quick Question on Maple, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Quick Question on Maple, Raqeeb Rasheed
  • Re: Quick Question on Maple, G. A. Edgar
• algebra with algebraic closure and extension thoeorem., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with algebraic closure and extension thoeorem., Rupert
    • Re: algebra with algebraic closure and extension thoeorem., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure and extension thoeorem., Rupert
• transform, Mathematician
  • Re: transform, drmwecker
  • Addendum Re: transform, drmwecker
• arc length, jraul
  • Re: arc length, Butch Malahide
    • Re: arc length, jraul
      • Re: arc length, Hero
  • Re: arc length, hagman
• Characterization of max/min rate of change, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Characterization of max/min rate of change, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Characterization of max/min rate of change, Robert Israel
    • Re: Characterization of max/min rate of change, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Characterization of max/min rate of change, Robert Israel
• Vector Problem, thuynguyenlan
  • Message not available
    • Re: Vector Problem, lan
      • Re: Vector Problem, Virgil
  • Re: Vector Problem, Mathematician
• Representation of partially ordered sets, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Representation of partially ordered sets, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Representation of partially ordered sets, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Representation of partially ordered sets, William Elliot
  • Re: Representation of partially ordered sets, Herman Rubin
• bounded variation, jraul
  • Re: bounded variation, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: bounded variation, jraul
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • bounded variation, jraul
• Integer solution, Deep
• Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, richard . clark2002
  • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, Hero
  • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, Proginoskes
    • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, richard . clark2002
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, Proginoskes
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, richard . clark2002
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, Proginoskes
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, richard . clark2002
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, richard . clark2002
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, Proginoskes
      • Re: Fallacious (!) proof that 1 = 0, richard . clark2002
• Pythagorean Tree, Gerry
  • Re: Pythagorean Tree, Gerry
• How do you average 'circular' symmetry in a SQUARE matrix?, Robert A. Macy
• Theorem for Hexagons with Opposite Sides Parallel, profmd
• Fundamental group question, James
  • Re: Fundamental group question, Zbigniew Karno
    • Re: Fundamental group question, James
      • Re: Fundamental group question, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Fundamental group question, Zbigniew Karno
• FLT - new thread, Ben
  • Re: FLT - new thread, hagman
    • Re: FLT - new thread, junoexpress
  • Re: FLT - new thread, nano bagonghi
    • Re: FLT - new thread, Proginoskes
      • Re: FLT - new thread, stephen
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
  • Re: FLT - new thread, Jonathan Hoyle
    • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Jonathan Hoyle
      • Re: FLT - new thread, junoexpress
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Jonathan Hoyle
  • Re: FLT - new thread, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: FLT - new thread, OwlHoot
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Justin
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Ben
      • Re: FLT - new thread, Denis Feldmann
• Algebraic curves, Richard Hayden
  • Re: Algebraic curves-, JEMebius
• Enumerating certain 32-bit Binary Sequences, gutbuster
  • Re: Enumerating certain 32-bit Binary Sequences, cbrown
  • Re: Enumerating certain 32-bit Binary Sequences, Tim Peters
• Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, ma_khan1981
  • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, ma_khan1981
      • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, hagman
      • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, ma_khan1981
  • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, hagman
    • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Butch Malahide
    • Message not available
      • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Graph theory: What is wrong with this proof?, Proginoskes
• Limit of an infinite series, API
  • Re: Limit of an infinite series, hagman
    • Re: Limit of an infinite series, API
      • Message not available
      • Re: Limit of an infinite series, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Limit of an infinite series, API
      • Re: Limit of an infinite series, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Limit of an infinite series, Cary
• Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
  • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, hagman
    • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Randy Poe
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, hagman
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Randy Poe
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Randy Poe
  • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
    • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Randy Poe
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, jp
  • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, Richard Henry
  • Re: Computer method for generating sine waves, user923005
• connected sums, T.Foliakis
• Re: linear maps, Ashay Burungale
• Silly question - Request for quick answer, babu
  • Re: Silly question - Request for quick answer, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Silly question - Request for quick answer, babu
• Integer value, Deep
  • Re: Integer value, James Waldby
    • Re: Integer value, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Integer value, Deep
      • Message not available
      • Re: Integer value, Michael Press
  • Re: Integer value, hagman
  • Re: Integer value, Pubkeybreaker
• A help with trigonometric functions, please, nicegirl_130
  • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Aage Andersen
  • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, morteza . naderali
    • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Hero
    • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Saurav
      • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Saurav
      • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Virgil
      • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, Saurav
      • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, danielmryan
  • Re: A help with trigonometric functions, please, The World Wide Wade
• algebra with the isomorphism extension theorem., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with the isomorphism extension theorem., mina_world
• algebra with algebraic closure., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Chip Eastham
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., mina_world
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Chip Eastham
  • Re: algebra with algebraic closure., Chip Eastham
• Re: kant - moderate publius parries a foundation (a circle, a line?), Jesse F. Hughes
• Transfer function G(s) best approximation, Feniks
• Total variation, Mate
  • Re: Total variation, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Total variation, Mate
      • Re: Total variation, David C . Ullrich
• Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
  • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Butch Malahide
    • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Herman Rubin
      • Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, Butch Malahide
      • Re: Hausdorff antimaximality principle, William Elliot
• The formidable pyramid figure, hagen
• domains of f ^-1 and f, sean_in_cali
  • Re: domains of f ^-1 and f, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: domains of f ^-1 and f, Arturo Magidin
• WARNING, Oleg
• help me recognize a symbol (composition series?), whatwouldjesussay
  • Re: help me recognize a symbol (composition series?), William Elliot
• Mathematic reversal of a number?, Mad_man_on_a_MissIon
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Chriz999
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, SPX2
    • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Bob Kolker
    • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Nick
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Robert Israel
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, William Elliot
    • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, cbrown
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, William Elliot
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, cbrown
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, William Elliot
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Nick
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, William Elliot
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, William Elliot
    • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, William Elliot
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Nick
    • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, G . Frege
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, hagman
    • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, James Waldby
      • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, hagman
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, Zak Seidov
  • Re: Mathematic reversal of a number?, BSK
• D'Alemberts solution to the wave equation., Sunny123
  • Re: D'Alemberts solution to the wave equation., carlos
• Help with a problem, JoeT
  • Re: Help with a problem, David T. Ashley
    • Re: Help with a problem, JoeT
      • Re: Help with a problem, Raqueeb Hassan
• how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, fei . w . steven
  • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, Kira Yamato
    • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, Kira Yamato
  • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, Kira Yamato
    • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, William Elliot
      • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, Kira Yamato
      • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, William Elliot
      • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, Butch Malahide
  • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, Zbigniew Karno
    • Re: how to prove: each family F of open sets of real numbers contains a countable subfamily E_n such at, fei . w . steven
• Re: JSH: What did I do?, stevefourier
  • Re: JSH: What did I do?, junoexpress
• the speed of light and shadowing, Jacko
  • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, William Elliot
    • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, William Elliot
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Jacko
  • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Michael Press
    • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Bob Kolker
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Michael Press
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Bob Kolker
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zirconium
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Michael Press
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Bob Kolker
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Michael Press
    • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Hero
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Michael Press
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Hero
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Amadeus Polonium-210
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Michael Press
      • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, Hero
  • Re: the speed of light and shadowing, kellrobinson
• question on PDE, Fedor
  • Re: question on PDE, Fedor
  • Re: question on PDE, don
• vre, ahmad6132
• Hunting another constant: the Nested Radical Constant 1.757932756618, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Hunting another constant: the Nested Radical Constant 1.757932756618, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: Hunting another constant: the Nested Radical Constant 1.757932756618, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: Hunting another constant: the Nested Radical Constant 1.757932756618 /correction, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Hunting another constant: the Nested Radical Constant 1.757932756618, Ioannis
    • Re: Hunting another constant: the Nested Radical Constant 1.757932756618, Gottfried Helms
• Appell Hypergeometric Function, OliveWork
• JSH: Still Hpoe in Europe, jstev@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Still Hpoe in Europe, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: JSH: Still Hpoe in Europe, hagman
  • Re: Still Hpoe in Europe, Dork Spotter
• integrability question, quebecstat
  • Re: integrability question, A N Niel
  • Re: integrability question, quebecstat
    • Re: integrability question, A N Niel
  • Re: integrability question, quebecstat
    • Re: integrability question, A N Niel
• Gershgorin's Theorem, Sarah Moore
  • Re: Gershgorin's Theorem, Sarah Moore
    • Re: Gershgorin's Theorem, Sarah Moore
    • Re: Gershgorin's Theorem, Robert Israel
• algebra with automorphism., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with automorphism., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: algebra with automorphism., mina_world
• regularity of eigenvectors of the laplacian, Fedor
  • Re: regularity of eigenvectors of the laplacian, David Bernier
    • Re: regularity of eigenvectors of the laplacian, Fedor
• factorial n, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
  • Re: factorial n, William Elliot
  • Re: factorial n, jankrihau
    • Re: factorial n, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
      • Re: factorial n, jankrihau
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: factorial n, Phil Carmody
      • Re: factorial n, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
      • Re: factorial n, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
  • Re: factorial n, matt271829-news
  • Re: factorial n, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: factorial n, A N Niel
  • Re: factorial n, Cary
    • Re: factorial n, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
      • Re: factorial n, jankrihau
      • Re: factorial n, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: factorial n, Cary
      • Re: factorial n - Stirling's seies, JEMebius
  • Re: factorial n, Hugo Pfoertner
• mysterious map, Philips
  • Re: mysterious map, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: mysterious map, Philips
      • Re: mysterious map, Jannick Asmus
• Re: JSH: What did I do?. Who's Lying, JSH?, Red
• Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
  • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Phil Carmody
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Phil Carmody
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zirconium
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Generating primitive element modulo prime (was: Correcting Dik ...), Gerry Myerson
    • Best way to generate primitive element modulo prime (was: ... Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Best way to generate primitive element modulo prime (was: ... Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test), Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), hagman
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test, mm
    • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...), Dik T. Winter
      • More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), Phil Carmody
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), Phil Carmody
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), Gerry Myerson
      • More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: More primality testing (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas ...), mm
      • Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...)), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...)), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...)), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...)), Robert Israel
      • Re: Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory: Proof of Fermat-Maas primality-test (was: correcting Dik ...)), Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory...), robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
      • Re: Google Groups broken even worse than before (was: Elementary group theory...), Dik T. Winter
• terms definitions solved problems, SPX2
  • Re: terms definitions solved problems, Guy Corrigall
    • Re: terms definitions solved problems, SPX2
      • Re: terms definitions solved problems, SPX2
      • Re: terms definitions solved problems, hagman
• JSH: Why are friendly people with nets here?, jstev@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Why are friendly people with nets here?, Giggling Volcanic Overboots
    • Re: Why are friendly people with nets here?, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Why are friendly people with nets here?, fishfry
• Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
  • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
    • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
  • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
    • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory, Updated., Fuckwit
      • Re: Small Set Theory, Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory, Updated., Fuckwit
      • Re: Small Set Theory, Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
  • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
    • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., Tonico
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., MoeBlee
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., hagman
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
      • Re: Small Set Theory,Updated., zuhair
• JSH: How will he stop ?, Al Golden
  • Re: JSH: How will he stop ?, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: How will he stop ?, Charles
      • Re: JSH: How will he stop ?, David T. Ashley
    • Re: JSH: How will he stop ?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: JSH: How will he stop ?, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: How will he stop ?, David T. Ashley
  • Re: How will he stop ?, Jon Slaughter
• An interpretation of Cauchy's integral theorem, richard . clark2002
  • Re: An interpretation of Cauchy's integral theorem, richard . clark2002
  • Re: An interpretation of Cauchy's integral theorem, richard . clark2002
• JSH: Why is he still posting ?, Jane Mandrake MIT
  • Re: JSH: Why is he still posting ?, amzoti
  • Re: JSH: Why is he still posting ?, amzoti
  • Re: JSH: Why is he still posting ?, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: JSH: Why is he still posting ?, amzoti
  • Re: JSH: Why is he still posting ?, fishfry
• Foundation., zuhair
  • Re: Foundation., MoeBlee
    • Re: Foundation., zuhair
      • Re: Foundation., MoeBlee
      • Re: Foundation., zuhair
      • Re: Foundation., MoeBlee
      • Re: Foundation., zuhair
      • Re: Foundation., MoeBlee
    • Re: Foundation., Michael Stemper
      • Re: Foundation., MoeBlee
  • Re: Foundation., Rupert
• Where can I find RK4 algorithm for coupled second order ode's, Kevin B
  • Re: Where can I find RK4 algorithm for coupled second order ode's, Robert Israel
  • Re: Where can I find RK4 algorithm for coupled second order ode's, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: Where can I find RK4 algorithm for coupled second order ode's, Kevin B
• JSH: My best guess about why, jstevh
  • Re: My best guess about why, Giggling Volcanic Overboots
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, Tim Peters
  • Re: My best guess about why, Mo Green
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, Red
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, dmoran21@xxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: My best guess about why, T.H. Ray
• Differentiation using quadratic splines, Pygmalion
• Neural Networks, quebecstat
  • Re: Neural Networks, jamesk156
• The PRIME Number '7', newstips6706
  • Re: The PRIME Number '7', David T. Ashley
  • Re: The PRIME Number '7', Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: The PRIME Number '7', drmwecker
    • Re: The PRIME Number '7', Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), stonemcstone
  • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Kira Yamato
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Kira Yamato
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Kira Yamato
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Hagen
      • Re: Ring theory question (UFDs/PIDs), Hagen
• Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", junoexpress
  • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Larry Lard
    • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", junoexpress
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Chumley
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", junoexpress
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Randy Poe
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Mo Green
  • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Erik Naggum
    • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", jstevh
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", qindars
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", jstevh
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Charles
    • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Erik Naggum
      • Re: Official Retraction of JSH "Publication", Jesse F. Hughes
• minimization problem, Bart
  • Re: minimization problem, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: minimization problem, Bart
  • Re: minimization problem, hagman
• set theory with antichain., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with antichain., Hero
  • Re: set theory with antichain., hagman
  • Re: set theory with antichain., William Elliot
    • Re: set theory with antichain., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with antichain., William Elliot
• help please, Philips
• set theory with least upper bound., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with least upper bound., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: set theory with least upper bound., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with least upper bound., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set theory with least upper bound., mina_world
• Noetherian (Well-founded) Induction, ma_khan1981
  • Re: Noetherian (Well-founded) Induction, William Elliot
    • Re: Noetherian (Well-founded) Induction, ma_khan1981
      • Re: Noetherian (Well-founded) Induction, ma_khan1981
• set theory with well ordering., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with well ordering., William Elliot
    • Re: set theory with well ordering., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., William Elliot
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Hero
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Hero
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Hero
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Russell
  • Re: set theory with well ordering., loic-dev
  • Re: set theory with well ordering., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: set theory with well ordering., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Arturo Magidin
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Virgil
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., Hero
      • Re: set theory with well ordering., hagman
• set theory with Cartesian product., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with Cartesian product., William Elliot
    • Re: set theory with Cartesian product., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with Cartesian product., William Elliot
      • Re: set theory with Cartesian product., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with Cartesian product., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: set theory with Cartesian product., mina_world
• Free Ebooks, Articles, PDF , Download on any topic, Mike
• Conformal structure = complex structure in two-dimensional case, jane
• Definition of Phytagorean Primes, Gerry
  • Re: Definition of Phytagorean Primes, matt271829-news
  • Re: Definition of Phytagorean Primes, matt271829-news
    • Re: Definition of Phytagorean Primes, Robert Israel
      • Re: Definition of Phytagorean Primes, Gerry
      • Re: Definition of Phytagorean Primes, matt271829-news
      • Re: Definition of Phytagorean Primes, Hugo Pfoertner
• line bundles on abelian varieties, singau
  • Re: line bundles on abelian varieties, JoeS
• Differentiable functions and bounded variation, Theo Wollenleben
  • Re: Differentiable functions and bounded variation, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Differentiable functions and bounded variation, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: Differentiable functions and bounded variation, Theo Wollenleben
  • Re: Differentiable functions and bounded variation, Dave L. Renfro
• Finite kernel of compact operator, peter_roinge
  • Re: Finite kernel of compact operator, Philips
  • Re: Finite kernel of compact operator, Robert Israel
• convexity, Philips
• definite integral, crtn
  • Re: definite integral, Oleg
    • Message not available
      • Re: definite integral, Rob Johnson
      • Message not available
      • Re: definite integral, Rob Johnson
      • Re: definite integral, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Message not available
    • Re: definite integral, Axel Vogt
      • Re: definite integral, G. A. Edgar
• Re: Limits at infinity in R, Red
  • Re: Limits at infinity in R, Denis Feldmann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Limits at infinity in R, Red
• Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Red
  • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Ganon Pani
    • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Richard Henry
  • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jason Pawloski
    • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jason Pawloski
    • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jason Pawloski
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Pat
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jason Pawloski
  • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Randy Poe
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Randy Poe
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Randy Poe
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, christian.bau
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Charles
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Wayne Brown
      • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Proginoskes
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jonathan Hoyle
    • Re: JSH: My Factoring Paper Accepted, Jesse F. Hughes
• SYNERGETICS, Oleg
  • Re: SYNERGETICS, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: SYNERGETICS, Oleg
  • Re: SYNERGETICS, Nick
    • Re: SYNERGETICS, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
      • Re: SYNERGETICS, Nick
      • Re: SYNERGETICS, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • SYNERGETICS, Oleg
    • Re: SYNERGETICS, Clifford Nelson
• Algebra Hint, jraul
  • Re: Algebra Hint, William Elliot
    • Re: Algebra Hint, William Elliot
  • Re: Algebra Hint, Virgil
  • Re: Algebra Hint, loic-dev
  • Re: Algebra Hint, robert maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
    • Re: Algebra Hint, Arturo Magidin
• Differentiating the Gamma function, ProbaWannabe
  • Re: Differentiating the Gamma function, Robert Israel
• a 2nd group problem, paul12
  • Re: a 2nd group problem, Bob Terwilliger
• Help finishing group problem, paul12
  • Re: Help finishing group problem, Bob Terwilliger
  • Re: Help finishing group problem, hagman
  • Re: Help finishing group problem, William Elliot
  • Re: Help finishing group problem, Arturo Magidin
• New information site, jim
• is there an english translation of 'Théorie nouvelle de l'action cappillaire' by Poisson?, zhangyilei
  • Re: is there an english translation of 'Théorie nouvelle de l'action cappillaire' by Poisson?, Nick
  • Re: is there an english translation of 'Théorie nouvelle de l'action cappillaire' by Poisson?, Nick
    • Re: is there an english translation of 'Théorie nouvelle de l'action cappillaire' by Poisson?, zhangyilei
• Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, James
  • Re: Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, Christopher J. Henrich
    • Re: Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, James
      • Re: Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: Definition of conic in algebraic geometry, Christopher J. Henrich
• Symerticaly polynomials of n variables, Pawel_Iks
  • Re: Symerticaly polynomials of n variables, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Symerticaly polynomials of n variables, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Symerticaly polynomials of n variables, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Symerticaly polynomials of n variables, M.J.T. Guy
• Question about existing function from R to R, which n iterations' graphs have exactly n lattice points, Pawel_Iks
• Rappresentazione matematica di una superficie quasi piana, dl
• Hop around the (permuted) Clock, Don McConnell
  • Re: Hop around the (permuted) Clock, matt271829-news
    • Re: Hop around the (permuted) Clock, Don McConnell
  • Re: Hop around the (permuted) Clock, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Hop around the (permuted) Clock, hagman
      • Re: Hop around the (permuted) Clock, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Rational solution?, Nicola Sottocornola
  • Re: Rational solution?, Michael Jørgensen
    • Re: Rational solution?, Nicola Sottocornola
    • Re: Rational solution?, Robert Israel
• Direction cosines in a non-Cartesian basis, massimo . nespolo
  • Re: Direction cosines in a non-Cartesian basis, Narasimham
  • Re: Direction cosines in a non-Cartesian basis, Narasimham
  • Re: Direction cosines in a non-Cartesian basis, Narasimham
  • Re: Direction cosines in a non-Cartesian basis, Narasimham
• Sym(n), Anolethron
  • Re: Sym(n), Arturo Magidin
• Could you help me with complex numbers?, nicegirl_130
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, David C. Ullrich
    • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, nicegirl_130
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Michael
    • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, nicegirl_130
    • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Hero
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Hero
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Randy Poe
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Dave Rosoff
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, T.H. Ray
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Michael Jørgensen
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Michael Press
    • Message not available
      • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, Michael Stemper
  • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, bobpgo
    • Re: Could you help me with complex numbers?, nicegirl_130
• 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Sunny123
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, ryan
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Randy Poe
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Narasimham
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Ioannis
    • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Sunny123
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Sunny123
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Randy Poe
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Narasimham
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, nicegirl_130
  • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, carlos
    • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Ronald Benedik
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, carlos
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Ronald Benedik
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, carlos
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Ronald Benedik
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Daniel Royer
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Virgil
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, carlos
      • Re: 1 + x + x^2 + x^3+ x^4 + x^5 + x^6, Virgil
• I have difficulty in integrating an equation having ArcTan and Cos nested, Negede
  • Re: I have difficulty in integrating an equation having ArcTan and Cos nested, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: I have difficulty in integrating an equation having ArcTan and Cos nested, kilian heckrodt
    • Re: I have difficulty in integrating an equation having ArcTan and Cos nested, A N Niel
• limiting PDE / correct scaling, don
• Analytical Number Theory, Möbius inversion formula, Wim Schols
  • Re: Analytical Number Theory, Möbius inversion formula, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Analytical Number Theory, Möbius inversion formula, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Analytical Number Theory, Möbius inversion formula, Gerry Myerson
• Tightness of arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Peter
  • Re: Tightness of arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Tim Peters
    • Re: Tightness of arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Peter
      • Re: Tightness of arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Tim Peters
      • Re: Tightness of arithmetic-geometric mean inequality, Peter
• discrete math with Fibonacci., mina_world
  • Re: discrete math with Fibonacci., The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: discrete math with Fibonacci., mina_world
• Fourier series and transforms, schoey2k
  • Re: Fourier series and transforms, David C . Ullrich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Fourier series and transforms, Rob Johnson
• Review papers on graph partitioning?, michael . wimmer1
• set theory with partial order., mina_world
  • Re: set theory with partial order., G.E. Ivey
    • Re: set theory with partial order., mina_world
      • Re: set theory with partial order., hagman
      • Re: set theory with partial order., mina_world
• math dilemma/illustration, Sandman
  • Re: math dilemma/illustration, Dave Seaman
  • Re: math dilemma/illustration, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: math dilemma/illustration, Sandman
• polynomial, Mathematician
  • Re: polynomial, Mathematician
  • Re: polynomial, Randy Poe
    • Re: polynomial, Mathematician
      • Re: polynomial, Chip Eastham
• Graphs and category theory, pgiacome@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Graphs and category theory, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Graphs and category theory, hagman
    • Re: Graphs and category theory, pgiacome@xxxxxxxxx
• Riesz representation theorem, peter_roinge
  • Re: Riesz representation theorem, don
  • Re: Riesz representation theorem, Christopher J. Henrich
• Re: Probabilistic Boolean Functions, kuerten
• Continuating heteroclinic bifucation with AUTO 2000 / Homcont, accountonehundred
• compactness in subspaces to l^p, peter_roinge
  • Re: compactness in subspaces to l^p, Robert Israel
• Metrics for cumulative distribution functions, deltaquattro
  • Re: Metrics for cumulative distribution functions, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Points of intersection problem, theglovegp
  • Re: Points of intersection problem, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Points of intersection problem, Narasimham
  • Re: Points of intersection problem, Temp
    • Re: Points of intersection problem, Nick
• matrix becomes strange, Peter Sambras
  • Re: matrix becomes strange, Virgil
• Counting is simple, Peter Sambras
  • Re: Counting is simple, Rakoto Ramparany
    • Re: Counting is simple, William Elliot
      • Re: Counting is simple, Rakoto Ramparany
      • Re: Counting is simple, William Elliot
      • Re: Counting is simple, Rakoto Ramparany
      • Re: Counting is simple, Nick
  • Re: Counting is simple, Kira Yamato
    • Re: Counting is simple, William Elliot
      • Re: Counting is simple, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Counting is simple, Nick
• JSH A Usenet Kook's Apology, huangxienchen
• Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?, riderofgiraffes
    • Re: Does This Ever Happen to Anyone Else?, Jesse F. Hughes
• Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Michael Press
  • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, William Hughes
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, William Hughes
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, William Hughes
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Michael Press
    • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Michael Press
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Virgil
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, MoeBlee
  • Re: Size of equivalence class of Cauchy sequences, Dave L. Renfro
• analysis question (bounded variation), jraul
  • Re: analysis question (bounded variation), Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: analysis question (bounded variation), David C. Ullrich
    • Re: analysis question (bounded variation), Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: analysis question (bounded variation), Guy Corrigall
• integration, novis
  • Re: integration, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Re: functional equation, Paul Abbott
• E=mc2 not quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ? There is no data how much mass (m) is destroyed and how much energy is emitted (E)., sciencecool@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: E=mc2 not quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ? There is no data how much mass (m) is destroyed and how much energy is emitted (E)., Brian
  • Re: E=mc2 not quantitatively confirmed in bombs exploded on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 ? There is no data how much mass (m) is destroyed and how much energy is emitted (E)., Peter Webb
• determinant of a matrix, novis
  • Re: determinant of a matrix, G Patel
  • Re: determinant of a matrix, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fermat Last Theorem, benjimon05@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fermat Last Theorem, benjimon05@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Jonathan Hoyle
      • Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
      • Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Ben
  • Re: Fermat Last Theorem, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zirconium
• Residue problem, Xavier Kohle
  • Re: Residue problem, Dick
  • Re: Residue problem, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Residue problem, Tim Peters
  • Re: Residue problem, The World Wide Wade
• a derivative, Fedor
  • Re: a derivative, user923005
• logarithmic scale interpolation, different
  • Re: logarithmic scale interpolation, matt271829-news
• isolated eigenvalues and poles, G. Kramer
• JSH: increasing total posting volume, mike
• Math software for Windows is scarce, lacersman
  • Re: Math software for Windows is scarce, user923005
• inverse of a symmetric positive definite matrix, novis
  • Re: inverse of a symmetric positive definite matrix, Randy Poe
  • Re: inverse of a symmetric positive definite matrix, Robert Israel
• Name for this poset? Sorta well-ordered, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Name for this poset? Sorta well-ordered, Robert Israel
    • Re: Name for this poset? Sorta well-ordered, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Name for this poset? Sorta well-ordered, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Name for this poset? Sorta well-ordered, Robert Israel
  • Re: Name for this poset? Sorta well-ordered, William Elliot
• just a big advertisement, progressivepassion
• JSH: New Era in My Math, Ganon Pani
  • Re: JSH: New Era in My Math, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: New Era in My Math, fishfry
• Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Chris Rodgers
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Chris Rodgers
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Robert Israel
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Dave L. Renfro
    • Message not available
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Robert Israel
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Robert Israel
      • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, user923005
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Integral of exp(sin(x)) dx, JEMebius
• Re: Proof that Infinite Integers are the Natural Numbers, Mark Nudelman
  • two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, a_plutonium
    • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, Peter Webb
      • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, a_plutonium
      • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, Proginoskes
      • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: two axiomatic systems to build the Natural Numbers and to build the Reals, Mark Nudelman
      • the illusion of Finite Integers, a_plutonium
      • Re: the illusion of Finite Integers, Mark Nudelman
      • Re: the illusion of Finite Integers, Tony Orlow
      • Re: the illusion of Finite Integers, Proginoskes
      • Re: the illusion of Finite Integers, Ken Quirici
• ∞, Kyla Oesterreich
  • Re: 8, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: 8, hagman
  • Re: ∞, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: 8, Jonathan Hoyle
• Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, fitz
  • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, William Elliot
      • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, huangxienchen
      • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, Tonico
      • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, kilian heckrodt
    • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, kilian heckrodt
  • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, Zim Olson
    • Re: Did you see what matematician Stephen Wolfram said about math?, huangxienchen
• Re: Differentiability of the Ruler Function, Dave L. Renfro
• Violation Of The Uncertainty Principle !!!, symphony
• Re: Conference ranking reference at www.conference-ranking.net, Nick
  • Re: Conference ranking reference at www.conference-ranking.net, Lee Rudolph
• well ordering, Saurav
  • Re: well ordering, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: well ordering, Kyla Oesterreich
      • Re: well ordering, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: well ordering, Herman Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • well ordering, Saurav
    • Re: well ordering, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: well ordering, Saurav
  • Well ordering, Saurav
    • Re: Well ordering, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Well ordering, Saurav
      • Re: Well ordering, Proginoskes
      • Re: Well ordering, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Well ordering, José Carlos Santos
• distance of 3-regular graph, jazzcat
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • distance of 3-regular graph, jazzcat
    • Re: distance of 3-regular graph, Proginoskes
• Recommendations on math for young folks, mubseestoo
  • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, William Elliot
    • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, Kyla Oesterreich
      • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, Nick
  • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, Nick
  • Recommendations on math for young folks, galathaea
    • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, Nick
  • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, junoexpress
  • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, Andrew Taylor
    • Re: Recommendations on math for young folks, Nick
• product of positive definite and semi-definite matrices, ays
  • Re: product of positive definite and semi-definite matrices, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: product of positive definite and semi-definite matrices, Robert Israel
    • Re: product of positive definite and semi-definite matrices, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: product of positive definite and semi-definite matrices, ays
• Elliptically Contoured Distributions (ECD) ?, Bart
• Finding x and y intercepts, theglovegp
  • Re: Finding x and y intercepts, Daniel Mayost
  • Re: Finding x and y intercepts, William Elliot
  • Re: Finding x and y intercepts, kilian heckrodt
    • Re: Finding x and y intercepts, theglovegp
• De Moivre's theorem, i . love . jeevitha
  • Re: De Moivre's theorem, Daniel Mayost
    • Re: De Moivre's theorem, i . love . jeevitha
      • Re: De Moivre's theorem, kilian heckrodt
      • Re: De Moivre's theorem, John Bailey
  • Re: De Moivre's theorem, Hero
  • Re: De Moivre's theorem, Dave L. Renfro
• Re: Very stupid, Brian
• Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Gvnaena Pura
  • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, fishfry
    • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Gvnaena Pura
      • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Bob Kolker
    • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, kilian heckrodt
      • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Why some mathematical "ancestry" in U.S. trace back to Germany?, kilian heckrodt
• Integer or Irrational, Deep
  • Re: Integer or Irrational, Red
    • Re: Integer or Irrational, Deep
• TI 84 Plus Silver calculator: Cheapest place to buy?, me
  • Re: TI 84 Plus Silver calculator: Cheapest place to buy?, Brian
  • Re: TI 84 Plus Silver calculator: Cheapest place to buy?, N. Silver
    • Re: TI 84 Plus Silver calculator: Cheapest place to buy?, N. Silver
      • Re: TI 84 Plus Silver calculator: Cheapest place to buy?, me
  • Re: TI 84 Plus Silver calculator: Cheapest place to buy?, Phil Holman
• Inference from bounds, Peter
  • Re: Inference from bounds, Robert Israel
• JSH: Accepting the Results, jstevh@xxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Accepting the Results, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: (fake) JSH: Accepting the Results, James Waldby
  • Re: Accepting the Results, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: JSH: Accepting the Results, nano bagonghi
  • Re: JSH: Accepting the Results, fishfry
  • Re: Accepting the Results, mike
• (Arithmetic) average of partial-averages = average of the whole?, sherifffruitfly
  • Re: (Arithmetic) average of partial-averages = average of the whole?, Tim Peters
  • Re: (Arithmetic) average of partial-averages = average of the whole?, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: (Arithmetic) average of partial-averages = average of the whole?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: (Arithmetic) average of partial-averages = average of the whole?, sherifffruitfly
• group proof explanation, jraul
  • Re: group proof explanation, Arturo Magidin
• group proof ?, jraul
  • Re: group proof ?, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • group proof ?, jraul
    • Re: group proof ?, jraul
• Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
  • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Paul Sperry
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
  • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, William Elliot
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
  • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
  • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, hagman
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
    • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, Marc
      • Re: Linear Algebra, Properties of sum of subspaces operator, G . Frege
• unionizing functions using 0/0, Martin Winer
  • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, Martin Winer
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, Martin Winer
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, Martin Winer
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, Martin Winer
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, huangxienchen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, huangxienchen
    • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, Martin Winer
    • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, G.E. Ivey
      • Re: unionizing functions using 0/0, David W . Cantrell
• Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, JAVIER RAMOS HERMAN
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: improved sieve of erastothenes, JAVIER RAMOS HERMAN
• Re: integral question, Bart
• Phase shift or phase angle?, Zac
  • Re: Phase shift or phase angle?, Narasimham
  • Re: Phase shift or phase angle?, Badger
    • Re: Phase shift or phase angle?, Zac
• Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Representation of probable path, Rod
    • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Representation of probable path, hagman
    • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
  • Re: Representation of probable path, Robert Israel
    • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Representation of probable path, Robert Israel
      • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Representation of probable path, Robert Israel
  • Re: Representation of probable path, Andy Smith
    • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
    • Re: Representation of probable path, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: Representation of probable path, Andy Smith
      • Re: Representation of probable path, huangxienchen
  • Re: Representation of probable path, Rod
• tensor analysis, Oleg
  • Re: tensor analysis, Florian Schmidt
    • Re: tensor analysis, Florian Schmidt
• absolutely continuous measures, Fedor
  • Re: absolutely continuous measures, Oleg
    • Re: absolutely continuous measures, Fedor
  • Re: absolutely continuous measures, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: absolutely continuous measures, Robert Israel
  • Re: absolutely continuous measures, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: absolutely continuous measures, Fedor
• ? neural network, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? neural network, Nick
• Counting measure/iterated integrals/Fubini's theorem, ProbaWannabe
  • Re: Counting measure/iterated integrals/Fubini's theorem, David C . Ullrich
• DE's with solutions going to infinity in a finite time, Onlydifferentiable
  • Re: DE's with solutions going to infinity in a finite time, Kira Yamato
    • Re: DE's with solutions going to infinity in a finite time, Robert Israel
• Want Help On GRE GMAT SAT TSE TOEFL IELTS ??, jaanu
• group question, paul12
  • Re: group question, cbrown
  • Re: group question, loic-dev
• Help - Complex analysis, Juan Barrios
  • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Robert Israel
    • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Rupert
    • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Kira Yamato
  • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Oleg
  • Re: Help - Complex analysis, Oleg
• Reference, Deep
  • Re: Reference, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Reference, Badger
  • Re: Reference, Badger
    • Re: Reference, Giovanni Resta
      • Re: Reference, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Reference, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: Reference, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Meaning of Magma output?, David Sevilla
• hyper-or-something-reals, wugi
  • Re: hyper-or-something-reals, wugi
• Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., rgamble
  • Re: Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., hagman
    • Re: Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., rgamble
      • Re: Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., Randy Poe
      • Re: Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., rgamble
  • Re: Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., Randy Poe
    • Re: Solving for multiple variables in ONE equation., Randy Poe
• Tough topology/analysis question, adomplayer
  • Re: Tough topology/analysis question, hagman
• Re: geometry with difficult..., johnjo
  • Re: geometry with difficult..., Zbigniew Karno
    • Re: geometry with difficult..., Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
      • Re: geometry with difficult..., Zbigniew Karno
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: geometry with difficult..., bill
• Multiply Then Add, Smallest Possible Integer, Leroy Quet
• Another Dots-Lines Game, Leroy Quet
• Numerical Recipes, piruk
  • Re: Numerical Recipes, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Numerical Recipes, Robert Israel
      • Re: Numerical Recipes, piruk
      • Re: Numerical Recipes, William Hughes
      • Re: Numerical Recipes, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Numerical Recipes, hagman
• #moderncalcs a new IRC Channel, RadSurfer
• Big Day for JSH, junoexpress
  • Re: Big Day for JSH, jankrihau
    • Re: Big Day for JSH, junoexpress
      • Re: Big Day for JSH, jankrihau
    • Re: Big Day for JSH, José Carlos Santos
• border, Sauro
  • Re: border, Dick
  • Re: border, Robert Israel
• Number-theoretic question (congruency), Adam Burley
  • Re: Number-theoretic question (congruency), jankrihau
• Modern Math Axioms, Lester Zick
  • Re: Modern Math Axioms, aatu . koskensilta
    • Re: Modern Math Axioms, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Modern Math Axioms, Lester Zick
      • Re: Modern Math Axioms, William Elliot
    • Re: Modern Math Axioms, Lester Zick
      • Re: Modern Math Axioms, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Modern Math Axioms, Lester Zick
    • Re: Modern Math Axioms, David Marcus
      • Re: Modern Math Axioms, Lester Zick
    • Re: Modern Math Axioms, William Elliot
      • Re: Modern Math Axioms, huangxienchen