Re: a simple(?) probability question...
- From: Jim Burns <burns.87@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 09:54:22 -0500
Joe wrote:
On Jan 21, 8:23 am, "Dirk Van de moortel"
<dirkvandemoor...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Have a look at the Poisson process and see if
it helps:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poisson_distribution
Try to understand how it can be applied in this case,
i.o.w. what would k and lambda be in this case?
What do you find?
Dirk Vdm
Your reasoning is faulty on this. A 50 year flood is not
the same intensity as a 100 year flood. So by analogy in
definition [...]
What is the definition of a 100-year storm?
Google is your friend.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22100+year+storm%22
http://climate.umn.edu/doc/misc/100year.htm
: One of the more confusing phrases used in meteorology
: and hydrology is "100-year storm". The phrase implies
: that an intense rainstorm dubbed as an "100-year" event
: brings rainfall totals heretofore unseen for 100 years,
: and not to be experienced again for another century.
: This is a logical, but incorrect conclusion to draw
: from the phrase. A "100-year storm" drops rainfall
: totals that had a one percent probability of occurring
: at that location that year. Encountering a "100-year
: storm" on one day does nothing to change your chances
: of seeing the same amount of precipitation the very
: next day.
HTH.
[...] a 50 year
flood is a flood expected to occur in 50 years which means it is in
fact has a probability of 1.0 [...]
This happens not to be the case.
[...] and has no bearing on the 50th year.
probability of a 100 years storm.
- References:
- Re: a simple(?) probability question...
- From: Joe
- Re: a simple(?) probability question...
- Prev by Date: Re: Proving that Xn->X doesn't imply equal expectations
- Next by Date: Re: Is continuum completely filled up?
- Previous by thread: Re: a simple(?) probability question...
- Next by thread: Re: a simple(?) probability question...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading