Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 11:55:02 -0700
In article <1172052400.509592.146560@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I don't believe in the favourable review of the first 8 chapters of his
book.
Buy it, read it. In contrast to set theory there is no necessity to
believe in anything with my book.
Regards, WM
In the first 8 chapters, there is apparently nothing of WM, and in the
ramaining chapters there is apparently nothing of mathematics, so why
would anyone want to buy it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Alois Steindl
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: *** T. Winter
- Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC? countable?uncountable?
- Next by Date: Re: Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):