Re: Kiddie question
- From: "Nick" <tulse04-news1@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:45:59 -0000
"Dean" <deanbrown3d@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1172034504.398991.222160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Imagine there are 1 billion couples, each on average having a 50%
chance of boys or girls.
Suppose after 10 years we wanted more girls than boys, for whatever
reason.
Each couple, for which their first kid is a girl, stops immediately.
If not a girl, they continue on until either they run out of time or
until they eventually fluctuate to girls > boys, stopping as soon as
girls > boys if it happens.
Do we end up with more girls this way?
Assume their is no biological effect other than 50% chance b/g each
time.
Can you be more specific?
What happens if there is a boy then a girl - do they stop?
And so on.
I did the same calculation with boys - see later.
If you stop when you have a boy - and have as many girls as you need until a
boy comes along then the average number of boys will be 1 and the average
number of girls will be 1.
I just used a spread***.
1 boy Prob .5
1 girl 1 boy Prob .25
2 girls 1 boy Prob 1/8
3 girls 1 boy Prob 1/16
Sum of probabilities=1
Average number of boys = 1 (every family has 1 boy)
Average number of girls = (1/4 +2/8 + 3/16 + 4/32 + ...)
I showed that the sum of the above series is 1 using Excel.
I am not clear what your simulation which took all night showed.
I did simulations in real time 30 years ago (eg a tennis game). I am not
clear why a simulation that you speak of would take all night these days.
Nick
.
- References:
- Kiddie question
- From: Dean
- Kiddie question
- Prev by Date: Re: ZFC? countable?uncountable?
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Kiddie question
- Next by thread: Re: Kiddie question
- Index(es):