Re: Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- From: Joachim Selke <selke@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 09:55:57 +0100
David W. Cantrell wrote:
Your guess is correct. The most important part of the integral lies near 0,
and so, for large n, a reasonable approximation of I(n) can be obtained by
replacing \infty by 1 and exp(-z) by 1, giving
(-1)^n * \int_0^1 [ln(z)]^n dz
which is indeed n! .
For a better approximation, use more terms of the Maclaurin expansion of
the exponential.
Thanks a lot! :-)
This helps me in proving my guess. But unfortunately I still don't know
where the name Euler-Mascheroni integrals comes from ...
Joachim
.
- References:
- Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- From: Joachim Selke
- Re: Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- From: David W . Cantrell
- Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- Prev by Date: Re: Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- Next by thread: Re: Did you hear about Euler-Mascheroni integrals?
- Index(es):