Re: Long division
- From: Quentin Grady <quentin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 15:41:54 +1300
This post not CC'd by email
On 28 Feb 2007 00:36:50 -0800, "user923005" <dcorbit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Consider (for instance) that all the math we do is essentialy with
polynomials operating against polynomials.
e.g.:
1234 * 5678
That could also be considered as
(1000 * 1 + 100 * 2 + 10 * 3 + 4) * (1000 * 5 + 100 * 6 + 10 * 7 + 8)
Of course, that grouping is arbitrary. We can collect the terms
however we like and still get the same result.
G'day G'day,
Thank you for this insight.
If you give a pointer to the proof in question, I guess that someone
can help you to see it clearly.
Take a look at Dave's reply. This helped me considerably. I wouldn't
be surprised to find there are other approaches.
Best wishes,
--
Quentin Grady ^ ^ /
New Zealand, >#,#< [
/ \ /\
"... and the blind dog was leading."
http://homepages.paradise.net.nz/quentin
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Long division
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Long division
- Prev by Date: Re: Long division
- Next by Date: Re: Probability question in an M/M/2/4 queue
- Previous by thread: Re: Long division
- Next by thread: Re: Long division
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|