Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.

In article <1172770795.066009.29180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 1 Mrz., 03:30, "*** T. Winter" <***.Win...@xxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1172673465.908565.212...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:>
> > > > What does that mean?
> > >
> > > You cannot express sqrt(2) as precisely as desired by numbers.
> >
> > Makes no sense at all. sqrt(2) in base sqrt(2) is 10.
>
> You cannot express the base sqrt(2) by the unit 1.

But the expression I use is precise enough to do calculations with it.

Yes, it is a fairly good approximation.

You are leaving the realm of reality.

I entered it.

Only in your dreams.

I fail to see many things you believe to see. But here you clearly
prove that these things really aren't there.

They may not be there in WM's world, but that world is a place of
exceeding strangeness.
.

Quantcast