Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.

From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 12:56:05 -0700

In article <1172771927.176281.193980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

I do not define C(oo) *starting from the complete tree* T(oo) but
using the union U(T(n)) of the finite trees, (because it is in
question whether T(oo) = U(T(n))).

If T(oo) is the complete infinite binary tree but U(T(n))) is not, then
none of WM's arguments about T(oo) are valid.
.

References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
  - From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
  - From: mueckenh

Prev by Date: 3D Splines?
Next by Date: Re: Betting on {0,1} strings ... game theory ?
Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread