Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves.Gaillard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 4 Mar 2007 00:10:48 -0800
He means true in the standard model. It's nothing to do with any
particular set of axioms.
What is the "standard model"?
Are there mathematical statements which have "nothing to do with any
particular set of axioms"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Rupert
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- References:
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Rupert
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Prev by Date: Lucjan E Boettcher (1872 - ? )
- Next by Date: nested intervals theorem, why nonempty intervals as condition?
- Previous by thread: Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Next by thread: Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Index(es):
