Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Mar 2007 11:37:42 -0800
On Mar 5, 8:33 pm, David Marcus <DavidMar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The normal definition of "function" includes specifying the domain and
codomain. So, a given function only has one codomain.
Not in set theory; not with the definition of 'codomain' that was
given:
c is a codomain of f <-> range(f) subset_of c.
So for NO set is there a UNIQUE codomain.
For every set, there is a unique range, but not a unique codomain,
since there are lots and lots of sets that are supersets of any range.
If you want to have a different defintion of 'codomain' so that there
is a unique codomain for each function, then fine, but with the
definition that has been given in this thread, it is a theorem that
every set has more than one codomain.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: fiesh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by Date: Re: PDEs
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading