Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Mar 2007 11:10:49 -0800
On 7 Mrz., 18:22, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
William Hughes wrote:
On Mar 6, 8:11 pm, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
William Hughes wrote:
More relevant is the fact that there is no point at which you have
added enough units to get an infinite number of natural numbers.
And therefore Cantor's diagonal proof fails to give a number.
Given an uncountable number of additions with some finite (nonzero)
lower bound, the sum will be an uncountable value.
Of course. But you will not awake someone who is dreaming to be
waking.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Myth about mathematicians and mental arithmetic
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):