Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Mar 2007 11:11:56 -0800
On 7 Mrz., 18:36, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mike Kelly wrote:
Kumquats are not natural numbers.
--
mike.
WM used them as a metaphor. Natural numbers apply to kumquats, and all
"objects", no?
I would never invent such a childisch nonsense. William seems to like
that stuff.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: David Marcus
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by Date: Re: Automorphism group & Centre
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|