Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 7 Mar 2007 13:11:40 -0800
On 7 Mrz., 20:41, "William Hughes" <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 7, 2:04 pm, mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
The Waft Maximum is defined as that what the projection does
No. You gave a detailed definition of the Waft Maximum
M: Let F be a sequence. WM(F) is the supremum S(F) of the range of the
M: sequence F = (a_n), if and only if this supremum is taken by the
M: sequence, i.e., if and only if S(F) is n the range of F, ran F =
{a_n
M: | n in N, a_n in R}. In all other cases WM(F) < S(F).
No mention of "that what the projection does".
No mention because this is the definition of "what the projection
does". But if you prefer to say "what the projection does" I will
agree.
So let's test whether you understood the meaning by some exercises:
1) What does the projection do with the sequence of all constructible
real number of the interval [5, 6]?
2) What does the projection do with the sequence of all constructible
real number of the interval [5, 6)?
3) What does the projection do with the sequence of all negative unit
fractions?
4) What does the projection do with all lines of the EIT?
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Are these statements équivalent to AC?
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|