Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.

mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 7 Mrz., 18:36, Tony Orlow <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Mike Kelly wrote:

Kumquats are not natural numbers.
--
mike.
WM used them as a metaphor. Natural numbers apply to kumquats, and all
"objects", no?

I would never invent such a childisch nonsense. William seems to like
that stuff.

Regards, WM


Okay. I guess the first reference I saw to the kumquats in question was by you, but I must have missed the first mention. Sorry.

WM, you don't disagree that there are infinite sets containing just finite values, such as the reals in [0,1], are you? I certainly agree that an infinite set of naturals must contain infinite values, but that's only because they are spaced apart by a unit in value. Isn't tat your thinking?

Tony
.