Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:07:35 -0600
On Fri, 09 Mar 2007 10:25:39 +0000, José Carlos Santos
<jcsantos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 09-03-2007 10:08, freensway@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Define a subspace of the real line that can be represented as theTake A = (0,1/2) U (1/3,1/4) U (1/5,1/6) U ... and B = {1}. Then A is
union of two locally compact subspaces, one of which is closed and the
other open, and that this is not a locally compact space.
Just to provide a definition: A topological space X is called a
locally compact space if for every x in X there exists a neighborhood
U of the poitn x such that the closure of U is a compact subspace of X.
open, B is closed, A and B are locally compact, but their union isn't.
Thanks. But in general is it just taking any open set that's locally
compact with a singleton sufficiently far from your open set that
yields this result? The problem arises when you union the singleton
with everything else?
My singleton was most definitely *not* far way from my open set. The
point of the singleton is located at the _boundary_ of my open set.
Actually what you wrote implies that A = (0,1/2) and B = {1}.
I suspect that there were typos in the definition of A _and_ the
definition of B - probably if you gave the definition you meant
then these most definite properties would be more clear...
But, of cours, the answer to your first question is negative. If
A = (0,1) and B = {x}, then the union of A and B is locally compact, no
matter where _x_ is.
I do not understand your second question.
Best regards,
Jose Carlos Santos
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- References:
- Locally Compact Subspaces
- From: freensway
- Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- From: freensway
- Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Locally Compact Subspaces
- Prev by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by Date: Re: Integrals don't necessarily preserve strict inequality?
- Previous by thread: Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- Next by thread: Re: Locally Compact Subspaces
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|