Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.

On Mar 9, 9:32 am, David Marcus <DavidMar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Virgil wrote:
In article <1173423233.774814.300...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"MoeBlee" <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 8, 6:55 pm, David Marcus <DavidMar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You just keep asserting. I don't claim that you can't find such a
definition in some advanced areas of mathematics (I always said there
is all kind of terminology out ther). But please show me basic
textbooks in abstract algebra, analysis or topology that claim a
function is a triple. And, no, saying "f is a function from D to C" or
"f is a subset of DxC such that...", etc. is NOT claiming that f is a
triple.

If the definition says a function consists of a domain and a codomain
and a set of ordered pairs, or requires specification of all three, then
it IS claiming that a function is a triple.

Quite right.

No. I answered that in my reply to that post by Virgil.

MoeBlee


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... is all kind of terminology out ther). ... textbooks in abstract algebra, analysis or topology that claim a ... it IS claiming that a function is a triple. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... is all kind of terminology out ther). ... textbooks in abstract algebra, analysis or topology that claim a ... it IS claiming that a function is a triple. ... I answered that in my reply to that post by Virgil. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... is all kind of terminology out ther). ... textbooks in abstract algebra, analysis or topology that claim a ... it IS claiming that a function is a triple. ...
    (sci.math)