Re: Cantor Confusion

In article <1173715726.469898.72890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 11 Mrz., 17:21, "Gc" <Gcut...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 maalis, 10:33, mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On 11 Mrz., 00:29, "Gc" <Gcut...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Please stick to one pseudonym. Otherwise it is tedious to killfile
you. I don't want to read you.

Regards, WM

I don`t have other pseudonyms, but fine: I will leave you alone with
your hallucinations.

Sorry if I have I have insulted you, but I have mixed you up with
someone else. My error. To answer your question:

If there are single paths in the tree, then their set is subject to
the restriction imposed by the cross sections (= numbers of nodes) of
the levels. These single paths cannot exist outside of any level.
Every level has a countable number of nodes.

Every level has only finite paths, so that the number of nodes and
number of paths are both finite in such finite paths.

If there are no single paths in the tree, ... then: where are they?

Married, and raising little paths?

Regards, WM
.

Quantcast