Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves.Gaillard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Mar 2007 01:00:14 -0700
On Mar 13, 10:48 pm, "MoeBlee" <jazzm...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"2+2=5" is not a theorem of PA.
Let me ask a precise question:
Can one rule out the possibility of proving 0=1 in the formal system
called PM in Gödel's "On Formally Undecidable Propositions of
Principia Mathematica and Related Systems"?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- References:
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Prev by Date: Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- Next by Date: A sort of reverse SAT
- Previous by thread: Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Next by thread: Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Index(es):