Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem

On 15 Mar, 05:40, jiahao_anti-addictga...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 15, 12:19 pm, Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.asuppri...@club-
internet.fr> wrote:
jiahao_anti-addictga...@xxxxxxxxxxx a écrit :

On Mar 14, 10:09 pm, jankri...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 14 Mar, 10:13, jiahao_anti-addictga...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Mar 14, 4:26 pm, "Tonico" <Tonic...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
***************************************
Hope no more: you ARE mistaken.
Tonio
The proof has been sent . Whether it is flawless or not , it all
depends on Jay to verify it now .
Flawed, as expected. :-)

I have e-mailed the refutation.

---
J K Hauglandhttp://home.no.net/zamunda

I don't think you can say that until , you read the other pages .

Every mathematician will tell you that *this* argument is not only
flawed, but makes clear you don't know what constitutes a (mathematical)
proof, and so disqualifies you.

Indeed you may be right , but indeed you misunderstood my intentions.
Jan did not read the further pages . He only saw the first page ,
which proves that Pythagorean Triples cannot work for FLT , he did not
read further as I said , so as he thought that my proof of FLT Was
basically that.

Denis is right. The first page shows that there is no hope of finding
anything of value in the following pages.

---
J K Haugland
http://home.no.net/zamunda


.

Relevant Pages