Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.

On 12 Mrz., 20:41, "William Hughes" <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 12, 1:10 pm, mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:





On 11 Mrz., 19:35, "William Hughes" <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mar 11, 4:08 am, mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

Consider the set R consisting of exactly two paths:

R= { (0,0,0,...),(1,1,1,...) }

The projection of R is the same as the projection of all paths
so:

The Waft Maximum of R is finite.

Why?

Because the Waft Maximum of R is the same as the Waft Maximum of the
EIT.

You wrote that R contains an infinite path (0,0,0,...). The EIT does
*not* contain any infinite line.

Indeed, R and the EIT are different. However two different
things can have the same Waft Maximum. Note they have the
same projection. If they have the same projection they
have the same Waft Maximum.

The have not the same Wat Maximum. Look up the definition.

Now let F1 be: the projection of all paths of the
union of all finite trees:

We have F1 is equivalent to the projection of the EIT.
Therefore since the projection of the EIT contains
infinitely many elements, so does F1.

Of course F1 contains infinitely many paths.

Let F2 = the projection of R.

You mean the projection of

0.000...
0.111...

This projection yields the waft maximum aleph_0.

No F1 has a finite waft maximum. F2 is equal to F1.

How do you see that? LSD, ethanol? If you continue with such non-
technical nonsense, I will stop this discussion.

Regards, WM

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... The projection of the EIT contains an infinite number of elements. ... Because the Waft Maximum of R is the same as the Waft Maximum of the ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... infinite by size too. ... Which immediately leads to the Waft Maximum of the ... not mean that the projection is finite" do you fail to understand? ... Let F be a sequence. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... Maximum of a set or about "what the projection does". ... Let P_I be the set of all infinite paths. ... its Waft Maximum is 1. ... Waft Maximum of the set of all finite paths. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... Your usual confusion between "infinite number of lines" ... That the projection contains finitely many filled positions. ... And as the Waft Maximum is completely irrelevent, ... How many columns in the EIT? ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
    ... *not* contain any infinite line. ... R and the EIT are different. ... things can have the same Waft Maximum. ... Why do you think that the WM of a unary number with omega units is the ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast