Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Mar 2007 03:58:26 -0700
On 15 Mrz., 15:18, "William Hughes" <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 15, 7:11 am, mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Never heard of projective algebraic variety? projective family?
The projection is nothing but the "process" of determining the WM.
How are the laws of optics involved?
projective geometry? etc. etc.?
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Does anybody know the antiderivative of that function?
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|