Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 16 Mar 2007 06:30:37 -0700
On 15 Mrz., 15:21, "William Hughes" <wpihug...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 15, 8:08 am, mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Indeed, R and the EIT are different. However two different
things can have the same Waft Maximum. Note they have the
same projection. If they have the same projection they
have the same Waft Maximum.
They have not the same Wafrt Maximum. Look up the definition.
The Waft Maximum is "what the projection does"
True or False?
True. (Therefore I wrote it.)
You appear to have changed the meaning of "projection" beyond
all recognition. Please define projection.
A projection is the process of gaining information about the Waft
Maximum (WM) of a set or about "what the projection does". What the
projection does with the set UF of all negative unit fractions is: It
leaves 0 uncovered. So we say, WM(UF) < 0. WM(UF) is not nought.
If two different things have the same projection
they have the same Waft Maximum.
Please answer the question yes or no.
That is, as you may observe from what I wrote above, a nonsense
question like "if you carry wood and earth, is sugar then sweet"?
We can say: If all elements of a set have a size less than x, then the
Waft Maximum of this set is less than x, where x may be any number of
any number class.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|