Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Mar 2007 07:09:32 -0700
On 16 Mrz., 16:35, "*** T. Winter" <***.Win...@xxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1174053086.178347.99...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> mueck...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
He assumed that he could multiply together an assigned multitude of primes.
That need not be assumed. That is obvious. Even for a Greek it was
possible by continued repetition of products of three factors.
Not that you could multiply together *all* of them.
He *proved*, by contradiction, that he could not multiply all
together.
Regards, WM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):