Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: Gottfried Helms <helms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 22:09:59 +0100
Am 15.03.2007 07:24 schrieb jiahao_anti-addictgamer@xxxxxxxxxxx:
On Mar 15, 2:21 pm, "Tonico" <Tonic...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:I propose to start studying
On 14 mar, 16:09, jankri...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:> On 14 Mar, 10:13, jiahao_anti-addictga...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
********************************On Mar 14, 4:26 pm, "Tonico" <Tonic...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:Flawed, as expected. :-)
***************************************The proof has been sent . Whether it is flawless or not , it all
Hope no more: you ARE mistaken.
Tonio
depends on Jay to verify it now .
I have e-mailed the refutation.
I'm shocked! A flawed proof of FLT by a math fan BUT NOT a
mathematician, who also loves to gossip about how REAL mathematicians
behave/research/work?? Nooooooo....really???!!!! That hardly
happens....what, some 4-5 times ONLY in the last 3-4 months and ONLY
in the NG??
Anyway, when I wrote "hope no more...etc." I was in fact refering to
Bassam, not to Jiahao...
Regards
Tonio
Pd. BTW, it seems to have been a rather gross flaw and in the first
page, uh? I mean, from what I read....I haven't seen the paper, though.
I have made the hard desciion of presenting my paper to everyone .
It may put me in the deepest shame but this will not ruin my passion
for mahematics .
Besides , when Wiles was young , he too had many flawed proofs . It
takes time to learn from your mistakes and finally suceed .
p p p q1 q2 q3
x - y = z = (x-y) Q1 Q2 Q3 ...
in terms of primefactorization (where Q1,Q2,... are primes),
considering the question: what can I know about the possible
primefactors and the possible exponents. Then also about the
primefactors of (x-y): can this have some prime-factors of
the set Q1,Q2,Q3,... ? Has p a special role? (Note, if
the Q-primefactors are not in (x-y), they all must have the
same exponent q1=q2=q3=p, if they are, the sum of their
exponents in the two partial-products must equal p)
When I started with this questions I stepped into many
very interesting fields with many open questions, like Mersenne
numbers, squarefreeness of Mersenne numbers, Sophie Germain-primes,
cyclotomic polynomials, the catalan problem (a^p - 1^p =?= b^q)
and always, after I found a "pattern" and then a rule, I also
found exciting articles in the internet and in the library,
where true explorative minds had already considered these
problems and often had beautiful approaches and proofs, Euler,
Szygmondi (? spell) to mention only two. The dead end for me was
then the problem of the difficult properties of Wieferich primes,
(and the possibility of double wieferich pairs) and the general
description for their occurence and their degree (which seems
still out of reach in NT)).
Although this path seems not to be successful for FLT, one can
learn a lot about similar problems. And with the concept of
cyclic subgroups many diophantine exponential problems can
easily be solved, even on high-school level.
So my proposal is: try to find applicable rules for the
occurence of powers of primes for expressions like
n n
x - y
based on varying n, not only primes, (if you did not already
study this). Apply that rules to interesting well known problems
like Mersenne-numbers, Catalan and the like to find the limit
of their explanatory power. For me I dealt with this about a year
(as an about-amateur from the scratch) and that was full with
adventure, discovery and learning.
Happy mathing -
Gottfried Helms
.
- References:
- Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: jiahao_anti-addictgamer
- Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: bassam king karzeddin
- Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: Tonico
- Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: jiahao_anti-addictgamer
- Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: jankrihau
- Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: Tonico
- Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- From: jiahao_anti-addictgamer
- Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- Prev by Date: How dense are they? sigma p/q
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- Next by thread: Re: Proof Attempt For Fermat's Last Theorem
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|