Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:17:12 -0600
In article <1174154040.161705.118010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mueckenh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 16 Mrz., 22:07, Virgil <vir...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1174052522.429305.221...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
We can determine the WM of an
infinite path or a set of them very well. It is aleph_0.
According to my recollection of WM's WMs, a WM on some set of objects
like lines must be a member of one of the objects.
Of which infinite path is aleph_0 a member?
Look at the EIT. It contains only finite lines, though all of them.
There is no line with aleph_0 elements. Therefore
WM(EIT) < aleph_0
Therefore, the existence of WM's WM(EIT), like the physical existence of
unicorns, is not instanciated,
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- References:
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: William Hughes
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: Virgil
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- From: mueckenh
- Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Prev by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by Date: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Previous by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Next by thread: Re: Review of Mueckenheims book.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|