Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: "Rupert" <rupertmccallum@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Mar 2007 04:21:22 -0700
On Mar 16, 7:41 pm, Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 2007-03-16, MoeBlee wrote:
Isn't there something about some kind of equi-consistency of ZF and
PM?
Nope. ZF(C) is much stronger than the simple theory of types.
Or is it equi-consistency of Z and PM I heard about?
Probably.
I thought that Z proved the soundness of PM. You can define a truth
predicate for the language of PM in the language of Z, and then prove
that PM is sound in Z by induction on the number of the highest type
that occurs in a sentence.
--
Aatu Koskensilta (aatu.koskensi...@xxxxxxxxx)
"Wovon man nicht sprechen kann, daruber muss man schweigen"
- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- References:
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Pierre-Yves . Gaillard
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Prev by Date: Re: Aaahhh... I can't believe this
- Next by Date: Re: Definition of a Random Sequence and Pi and e
- Previous by thread: Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Next by thread: Re: continuum hypothesis and 0=1
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|