Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: "Jonathan Hoyle" <jonhoyle@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Mar 2007 12:18:57 -0700
Obviously, it is metatheoremetical.
Please define "metatheoremetical". As there is no such word in the
English language, you will need to define your terms. Or do you just
make this stuff up as you go along?
Is your memory so short you don't remember the word was just defined?
To my knowledge you have never defined it. The closest I have ever
received from you was some vague post that the word was "about
theorems". Aside from that, I know of no hint as to what it means.
If you would like to provide the link to when you gave its definition,
I would be happy to receive it.
A definition of point is the coordinate, or coordinates. That's
basically its definition.
How is the definition of a point related to the discussion at hand?
It is just that the calculus is only so for no finite case.
Calculus is only so *what* for no finite cases of *what*? I see words
chasing an idea but failing to capture it. Can you restate this all
again more rigorously? Thanks.
Obviously the continuous is discretizable.
This is not obvious to me. Perhaps I am misunderstanding your point
here. Are you referring to the well-ordering of the reals? If so,
how is that related to what was already stated?
Hope that helps,
Jonathan Hoyle
Eastman Kodak
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- References:
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Math1723
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Jonathan Hoyle
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- From: Ross A. Finlayson
- Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- Prev by Date: Re: algebra calculator features
- Next by Date: Re: convergence of a submartingale
- Previous by thread: Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- Next by thread: Re: A puzzle for Cantorists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|