Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- From: "georgie" <geo_cant@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Mar 2007 12:47:56 -0700
On Mar 28, 12:57 pm, "georgie" <geo_c...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mar 28, 12:23 pm, riderofgiraffes <mathforum.org...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
But surely you could name the first committee
in one hour, then the next in 30 minutes, the
next in 15 minutes, the next in 7.5 minutes,
and so on, each time taking half the previous
time to name the next committee. In that way
you'd be done in two hours.
I doubt many people believe that there is any
chance of that working, but most people would
probably agree that given all of eternity, an
unbounded list could be produced.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- From: riderofgiraffes
- Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- References:
- Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- From: georgie
- Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- From: riderofgiraffes
- Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- From: georgie
- Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- Prev by Date: Random Variables
- Next by Date: Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
- Index(es):