Re: Cantor For Dummies ...

On Mar 28, 2:55 pm, riderofgiraffes <mathforum.org...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

What I've been saying is this:

I have an algorithm such that
If you have a algorithm for generating
a list of committees, then
my algorithm generates a committee
that your algorithm doesn't generate.

I don't have an algorithm. If we list all the algorithms
that genererate a committee (Nobody disputes that these
algorithms can be listed.), then your algorithm is on that
list. The output of all those algorithms is unattainable,
but nevertheless, platonistically exists. Your algorithm
can't possibly operate on its own output, so what you have
been saying makes no sense.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
    ... algorithms that output a committee can be listed. ... committee output by my algorithm depends on its input. ... If it is an actual algorithm and uses valid input. ... other than lists made from the output. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
    ... If you have a algorithm for generating ... algorithms that generate a committee ... ... you're saying doesn't appear to be relevant. ... to all those committees requiring it - mine included. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
    ... If you have a real algorithm and it outputs a committee, ... If it is an actual algorithm and uses valid input. ... So we can only use any list other than lists ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
    ... If you have a algorithm for generating ... algorithms that generate a committee ... ... You fall alot. ... If you're saying that the committees don't need input, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Cantor For Dummies ...
    ... You seem to be writing a great deal, ... If you have a algorithm for generating ... algorithms that generate a committee ... ... If you're saying that the committees don't need input, ...
    (sci.math)