Re: commutes with translation
- From: "Fedor" <malabar_carotte@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Mar 2007 04:55:09 -0700
On Mar 31, 11:30 am, A N Niel <ann...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1175319591.265280.238...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Fedor <malabar_caro...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hi all,
how can one prove that a linear bounded operator T:L^1(R) -> L^1(R)
that commutes with translation is of the following form:
T(f)=f * \mu
where \mu is a measure (and * is the convolution)?
thanx,
Fedor
Of course, \mu could be a signed measure... or a complex measure?
of course
.
- References:
- commutes with translation
- From: Fedor
- Re: commutes with translation
- From: A N Niel
- commutes with translation
- Prev by Date: Re: commutes with translation
- Next by Date: Re: n - charged particles
- Previous by thread: Re: commutes with translation
- Next by thread: Re: commutes with translation
- Index(es):