Re: Cantor set
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2007 14:53:32 +0000 (UTC)
In article <461117bd$0$97236$892e7fe2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Andersen <andersen_800@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dave Seaman wrote:
One way to see this is to notice that 1/3 can be written as
(0.02222...)_3. Any number having a base-3 representation that contains
no 1's is a member of the Cantor set.
This is my problem. Because the Cantor set was indeed defined as the way
you defined it in my book. But 1/3 is (0.1)_3 right? So (0.0222...)_3 is
some other number.
No. Some numbers have more than one ternary representation, just as
some numbers have more than one decimal representation.
You know that 0.999999.... is equal to 1.00000... ? The same
phenomenon is being seen with 1/3.
Look at the definition: it says that a number that has ->a<- base-3
representation with the property is in the set. This means that IF a
number has two representations, and at least one of them contains no
1's, then it ->is<- in the set.
Where am I wrong? Is it so that (0.1)_3 = (0.02222...)_3 ? If so, then why?
Remember what the numbers means.
0.02222....
means the result of the convergent series
2/3^2 + 2/3^3 + 2/3^4 + .... + 2/3^n + ...
This is a geometric series, to wit
(2/9)*(1 + 1/3 + 1/9 + ... + 1/3^n + ...)
and the geometric series 1+ 1/3 + ... converges to
1/(1 - (1/3)) = 1/(2/3) = 3/2. Thus, this series converges to
(2/9)*(3/2) = 3/9 = 1/3.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Cantor set
- From: Andersen
- Re: Cantor set
- References:
- Cantor set
- From: Andersen
- Re: Cantor set
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Cantor set
- From: Andersen
- Cantor set
- Prev by Date: Re: The Collatz discrete primes!
- Next by Date: Re: product
- Previous by thread: Re: Cantor set
- Next by thread: Re: Cantor set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|