Re: Baseball
- From: "mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mensanator@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2007 15:54:58 -0700
On Apr 10, 5:07 pm, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"mensana...@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mensana...@xxxxxxx> writes:
I think you will find that the teams 1 through 8 will not average 77 wins
each. Teams 1-4 will average more than that, and teams 5-8 will average
fewer.
You may think I'll find that, but that's not what I find:
team: 0 Average wins: 76
team: 1 Average wins: 77
team: 2 Average wins: 77
team: 3 Average wins: 77
team: 4 Average wins: 77
team: 5 Average wins: 76
team: 6 Average wins: 76
team: 7 Average wins: 76
A) you do realise you're answering a different question from everyone else, don't you?
You do realize that everyone else is not answering
the question that was asked, don't you?
B) Get a better random number generator, yours has failed the chi-squared test.
Nothing wrong with the random number generator,
it's what happens over 100 seasons with integer arithmetic.
The differences are past the decimal point, so everyone
is tied, like I said.
Phil
--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Baseball
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Baseball
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Baseball
- References:
- Baseball
- From: john0714@xxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: beeworks
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: Phil Carmody
- Baseball
- Prev by Date: Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- Next by Date: Re: Baseball
- Previous by thread: Re: Baseball
- Next by thread: Re: Baseball
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|