Re: Baseball
- From: Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 11 Apr 2007 16:11:55 +0300
"mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mensanator@xxxxxxx> writes:
On Apr 10, 5:07 pm, Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demun...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
B) Get a better random number generator, yours has failed the chi-squared test.
Nothing wrong with the random number generator,
it's what happens over 100 seasons with integer arithmetic.
The differences are past the decimal point, so everyone
is tied, like I said.
I hope you made sure your probabilities were all integers too,
just to be consistent.
Phil
--
"Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank
so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of
/In God We Trust, Inc./.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- References:
- Baseball
- From: john0714@xxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: beeworks
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Baseball
- From: Phil Carmody
- Re: Baseball
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Baseball
- Prev by Date: Re: variation on Leo Wapner's product of sines question
- Next by Date: Re: An old SAT problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Baseball
- Next by thread: Re: Baseball
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|