Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
- Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 21:59:07 GMT
In article <uchq13ddei1hcgaf87o1fh37folref8s06@xxxxxxx>,
quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:09:27 GMT, rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
wrote:
However, I am curious why you claim that pi x + y = e has no solution
in natural x and y, but that it is unknown whether pi x - y = e has a
solution. It would seem that one has a solution if and only if the
other does.
Natural number means positive integer, hence x >= 1.
I've got to read more carefully. I was reading the "diofantine" in
the title and not paying attention.
Rob Johnson <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
take out the trash before replying
to view any ASCII art, display article in a monospaced font
.
- References:
- question regarding diofantine equations
- From: laura
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: quasi
- question regarding diofantine equations
- Prev by Date: analysis of why invalid Re: new standard for Euclid IP proof-- able to give both Direct and Indirect alongside one another Re: Correcting Wikipedia's Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Proof
- Next by Date: Re: Functions continuous only at the rationals and only at the integers
- Previous by thread: Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- Next by thread: Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|