Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:15:59 GMT
In article <uchq13ddei1hcgaf87o1fh37folref8s06@xxxxxxx>,
quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:09:27 GMT, rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
wrote:
However, I am curious why you claim that pi x + y = e has no solution
in natural x and y, but that it is unknown whether pi x - y = e has a
solution. It would seem that one has a solution if and only if the
other does.
Natural number means positive integer, hence x >= 1.
OP, whom you snipped, allowed 0 as a natural number. Of course
even with that definition it's clear pi x + y = e has no solution in
natural x and y.
And, for the record, I prefer your convention to that of OP.
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- References:
- question regarding diofantine equations
- From: laura
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: quasi
- question regarding diofantine equations
- Prev by Date: Calculus of variations vs. continuous-time dynamic programming
- Next by Date: Re: Proof of knight's tour in chess
- Previous by thread: Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- Next by thread: Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|