Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 01:20:43 GMT
In article <gerry-108D75.10155612042007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <uchq13ddei1hcgaf87o1fh37folref8s06@xxxxxxx>,
quasi <quasi@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 19:09:27 GMT, rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Rob Johnson)
wrote:
However, I am curious why you claim that pi x + y = e has no solution
in natural x and y, but that it is unknown whether pi x - y = e has a
solution. It would seem that one has a solution if and only if the
other does.
Natural number means positive integer, hence x >= 1.
OP, whom you snipped, allowed 0 as a natural number. Of course
even with that definition it's clear pi x + y = e has no solution in
natural x and y.
And, for the record, I prefer your convention to that of OP.
When I was in school, the whole numbers included 0 and the natural
numbers did not, so I am used to that definition, too.
Rob Johnson <rob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
take out the trash before replying
to view any ASCII art, display article in a monospaced font
.
- References:
- question regarding diofantine equations
- From: laura
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Rob Johnson
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: quasi
- Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- From: Gerry Myerson
- question regarding diofantine equations
- Prev by Date: Comprehensive Graphing (was: roots of x^12 = 2^x)
- Next by Date: Re: Fourier analysis problem on which I'm stumped
- Previous by thread: Re: question regarding diofantine equations
- Next by thread: derivative multivariate cumulative density function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|