Re: Probability of chain of n 'same side' deviations.
- From: "Chalky" <chalkyspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Apr 2007 02:17:37 -0700
On Apr 13, 9:43 am, "Chalky" <chalkys...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 13, 9:19 am, "John (Liberty) Bell"
<john.b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 13, 8:41 am, "Chalky" <chalkys...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am examining the 'goodness of fit' of statistical data to theory
curves, and reckon that the probability of a sequence of n data points
all lying on the same side of the curve, should be 1/2^n-1, (basic
heads/tails binary probability theory, if the data deviations from
theory are supposed to be random). That, at least, should be the case
if n is the total number of available data points.
However, I am not so sure how to calculate probabilities (more
precisely, improbabilities), if you have, say, 7 highs in a row, out
of a total set of 10 data points,
First example, at least, seems to be easy.
Probability of next 6 coin flips after the first one, giving same
result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Else, probability of next 6 coin flips after the second one, giving
same result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Else, probability of next 6 coin flips after the third one, giving
same result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Else, probability of next 6 coin flips after the 4th one, giving same
result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Hence P = (q-n)/2^(n-1), where q is total size of set.
Your next example might be a bit trickier.
or, say, 7 highs in a row, followed
by 6 lows in a row, out of a total set of 16 data points.
Perhaps not trickier, after all.
1st chain thus has probability of 9/2^6
2nd chain thus has probability of 8/2^5=1/4
Total probability (product of the two) is thus 9/2^8 =~ 3.5%
Theory thus disproven by data with ~ 96.5% confidence!
Can anyone find any weakness/error in this logical conclusion?
Actually, I already have found a weakness, myself.
John said:
Probability of next 6 coin flips after the first one, giving same
result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Else, probability of next 6 coin flips after the second one, giving
same result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Else, probability of next 6 coin flips after the third one, giving
same result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Else, probability of next 6 coin flips after the 4th one, giving same
result, is 1/2^(n-1).
Hence P = (q-n)/2^(n-1), where q is total size of set.
The final statement is wrong, as it gives > 100% probability when q >>
n.
If a is the first probability, shouldn't the total probability be:
a + (1 - a)a + (1 - (1 - a)a)a + ....?
.
- References:
- Probability of chain of n 'same side' deviations.
- From: Chalky
- Re: Probability of chain of n 'same side' deviations.
- From: John (Liberty) Bell
- Re: Probability of chain of n 'same side' deviations.
- From: Chalky
- Probability of chain of n 'same side' deviations.
- Prev by Date: Re: Cantor Confusion
- Next by Date: Classical Fourier analysts are kinda like anthropologists
- Previous by thread: Re: Probability of chain of n 'same side' deviations.
- Next by thread: X(M), vector space (over R )of C^oo functions, dimension
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|