Re: teminology
- From: fishfry <BLOCKSPAMfishfry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2007 11:58:26 -0700
In article <1176455217.528539.209410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"gius" <giu.giorgi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, everyone,
In mathematics,
what does it mean for a map defined in a certain set,
say A,
to extend "naturally" to a set B which contains as a proper subset
the set A ?
It means the "obvious" extension. It's the extension 10 out of 10
mathematicians would pick if you asked them. In other words there's not
always a precise definition, but it's obvious.
Example: f:N->N given by f(n) = n, where N is the naturals. How would
you extend that "naturally" to the reals? Obviously you'd pick the
identity function on the reals; even though there are uncountably many
other extensions that take the same values on N.
Does that help?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: teminology
- From: Zdislav V. Kovarik
- Re: teminology
- References:
- teminology
- From: gius
- teminology
- Prev by Date: Re: new standard for Euclid IP proof-- able to give both Direct and Indirect alongside one another Re: Correcting Wikipedia's Euclid's Infinitude of Primes Proof
- Next by Date: Re: Help me with my survey :)
- Previous by thread: Re: teminology
- Next by thread: Re: teminology
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|