Re: cromatic number
- From: "dor" <byndrsn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 13 Apr 2007 13:33:37 -0700
On Apr 13, 6:20 am, mdifrancesco2...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Is always true that cromatic number is equal to the max cardinality of
a clique? Can you give me the proof please.
Thank you.
No, it is very untrue. There is a theorem by Erdos that says: "For
every k and l there exists a graph G with chromatic number >= k and
girth >= l".
In particular, for every k there exists a triangle-free graph with
chromatic number k (see Mycielski graphs for an explicit
construction). Note that a triangle-free graph has a maximum clique of
size 2 (just an edge).
Pick any chromatic number you want, and you can (explicitly) construct
a graph with that chromatic number that does not have a clique with
size greater than 2.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: cromatic number
- From: bockermann
- Re: cromatic number
- From: bockermann
- Re: cromatic number
- References:
- cromatic number
- From: mdifrancesco2003
- cromatic number
- Prev by Date: Re: Linear Programming Question
- Next by Date: Re: the male alpha problem in math and the sciences (references)
- Previous by thread: Re: cromatic number
- Next by thread: Re: cromatic number
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|