Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- From: Dave Seaman <dseaman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:54:40 +0000 (UTC)
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007 11:44:19 GMT, Aatu Koskensilta wrote:
On 2007-04-24, David C Ullrich wrote:
Well, since they _are_ numbers it's still a little hard to see how
they can be less _like_ numbers.
Transcendental functions are numbers? What do you know!
Actually, the original question mentioned sin(x), cos(x), and exp(x),
which are numbers, not functions.
--
Dave Seaman
Oral Arguments in Mumia Abu-Jamal Case to be heard May 17
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
<http://mumia2000.org/>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- From: dillogimp@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- From: dillogimp@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- Prev by Date: Re: directional derivative,-
- Next by Date: Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- Previous by thread: Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- Next by thread: Re: All the transcendental numbers and functions like sin(x) are basically "arguments" right?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
