f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- From: humberto.bortolossi@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Apr 2007 04:03:54 -0700
Greetings!
Nowadays, most calculus books say that f(x) = 1/x is discontinuous in
x = 0. However, "analytic" oriented books (like Apostol) say f(x) = 1/
x is continuous: the point 0 doesn't matter, since it doesn't belong
to the function's domain.
I'm really curious to know when and who made this bifurcation. What
concept came first? Any historical references?
Thanks in advance, Humberto.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- From: mathedman
- Re: f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- From: Vincenzo Librandi
- Re: f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- From: Driveby
- Re: f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- From: Dave Seaman
- Re: f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- Prev by Date: Re: I Need Help
- Next by Date: Re: matrix rings
- Previous by thread: New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, April 30, 2007
- Next by thread: Re: f(x) = 1/x: to be or not to be continuous ...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|