Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- From: "mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx" <mensanator@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 4 May 2007 16:58:47 -0700
On May 4, 6:01 pm, Jack Sarfatti <sarfa...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No I don't wonder why. It's phase space volume - elementary statistical mechanics.
OTOH, *** draws flies.
The population of idiots is much larger than the population of competents much less of geniuses.
Which category do you see yourself in? Doesn't matter, I suppose. Even
Einstein's *** stank.
It's easy to be negative, projecting your own empty life and feelings of worthlessness, which in many cases is justified. Good thing these twits are not from a certain town in Jordan where their main export is suicide bombers in Iraq. See today's NY Times for details.
Why is it a "good" thing? Isn't it wiser for the twits to get rid of
themselves?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- From: Jack Sarfatti
- Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- References:
- Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- From: mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- From: Jack Sarfatti
- Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- Prev by Date: Re: Polyhedra with congruent faces
- Next by Date: Re: Gerald t' Hooft
- Previous by thread: Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- Next by thread: Re: Why I seldom reply to Sci Math
- Index(es):