Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: Gerry Myerson <gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 May 2007 22:33:57 GMT
In article <1178470327.759065.292100@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx" <charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Perhaps within this concept lurks the narrow gateway - the key - to
entering into the solving of the problem of finding a test of, or
formula for, primes.
The problem of finding a test for primes was solved by Euclid.
The problem of finding an *efficient* test for primes, well,
that one is still open - but I'd be more confident of your chances
if I thought you knew anything about the progress that has been
made on that problem over the last two thousand years, and
especially over the last 25 years or so. Are you familiar with,
say, the Adleman-Pomerance-Rumely-Cohen-Lenstra method?
Do you know how good it is? Do you have any reason to believe
that your concept will lead to anything better?
--
Gerry Myerson (gerry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) (i -> u for email)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- References:
- Towards a Formula for Primes
- From: charleswehner@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Towards a Formula for Primes
- Prev by Date: Re: Homeomorphic images of a line in R^2
- Next by Date: Re: Homeomorphic images of a line in R^2
- Previous by thread: Towards a Formula for Primes
- Next by thread: Re: Towards a Formula for Primes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|